What factual beliefs are your bare minimum baseline to consider someone worthy of any intellectual respect?

I know many will say mine are "reddit" but not believing something because redditors are stupid and annoying is even more stupid and annoying than being a redditor. Redditors just came to their beliefs through luck and osmosis instead of consideration.

Dealbreakers:

>Any sort of theistic belief, and anything beyond a "well we must show some humility when it comes to the ultimate nature of reality" <p(0.01) deistic stance

>Anything other than materialism/physicalism/naturalism beyond the quasi-deistic humility caveat above

>Any kind of stance like dualism or panpsychism

>Any kind of woo-woo belief like ESP, astrology, crystal healing, palm reading

>Belief that UFO/UAPs are explained by extraterrestrial, extradimensional, or extratemporal beings

>Belief in any conspiracy theory at all, with only a minuscule few as exceptions where "well it could be plausible/it isn't completely crazy to consider" could possibly be acceptable

>Belief that the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines caused or contributed to more than 500 deaths in the United States (the real number is far lower but that's just where I cap my benefit of the doubt towards you)

>Belief that MMR vaccines cause autism

>Belief that humans aren't playing a significant role in global warming via emissions of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere

>Belief, at any point, that Craig Wright is likely Satoshi Nakamoto