Search Results
7/2/2025, 12:10:58 PM
>>16712300
I believe the last reported rate of US children (<24 months) that were not vaccinated in the US was hovering near 1.2% with some margin for error.
>3.6 million babies born in the USA in 2024
>43,200
>3.59 million babies born in 2023
>43,080
My kids are included in that calculation. I live in a state that allows vaccine exemptions based on medical, religious, or conscience objections. If the US government were to pay for a study (therefore me) to passively monitor my kid's health, I would take that offer. I think 90% of the parents of those kids would as well, and some for free just to let them attend public school again once the data supprts that vaccines have properly been tested. I will never follow the logic of the 'ethical considerations' of not allowing a proper double blind study due to not giving the life saving juice that is exempt from double blind studies and financial compensation if something goes wrong. You know, like every other drug in the pharmaceutical world.
In fact, give me the link or phone number and I will register them for that study today. But that study doesn't exist because (((they))) don't want that study to exist. Assuming $30 per dose (well under the actual amount) but conveniently free if you have insurance, someone still pays for the manufacturing, distribution, administration, and 'safety studies'. You are looking at $100 million per vaccine. Now look at the CDC vaccine schedule and multiply by that number per child. No study will ever exist to reduce that margin of profit.
I believe the last reported rate of US children (<24 months) that were not vaccinated in the US was hovering near 1.2% with some margin for error.
>3.6 million babies born in the USA in 2024
>43,200
>3.59 million babies born in 2023
>43,080
My kids are included in that calculation. I live in a state that allows vaccine exemptions based on medical, religious, or conscience objections. If the US government were to pay for a study (therefore me) to passively monitor my kid's health, I would take that offer. I think 90% of the parents of those kids would as well, and some for free just to let them attend public school again once the data supprts that vaccines have properly been tested. I will never follow the logic of the 'ethical considerations' of not allowing a proper double blind study due to not giving the life saving juice that is exempt from double blind studies and financial compensation if something goes wrong. You know, like every other drug in the pharmaceutical world.
In fact, give me the link or phone number and I will register them for that study today. But that study doesn't exist because (((they))) don't want that study to exist. Assuming $30 per dose (well under the actual amount) but conveniently free if you have insurance, someone still pays for the manufacturing, distribution, administration, and 'safety studies'. You are looking at $100 million per vaccine. Now look at the CDC vaccine schedule and multiply by that number per child. No study will ever exist to reduce that margin of profit.
Page 1