>>149235680
>what the nature of the mechanical failures were on the IMSA cars?
The only thing we know that the 101 lost oil pressure, possibly not even the team knows yet. It can be a broken seal, piping, or anything really. The moment of failure photo where the crypto joke came from

>>149235889
it's a technical infringement, a performance related one
a full dq is a minimum
why ? because you won't ever be able to determine what kind of performance advantage it gave (flexi wing so it surely helped with that suspiciously high top speed btw). You cant even argue that it's damage result bc its a deflection test. The rules are clear, if you fail dq
dunno why burgers are cucked to cheaters so much