>>63991106
>Because it's never going to be stealth.
They why are they developing one right now?
https://x.com/fa50_defense/status/1915015955861868752
>Even with a IWB it wouldn't even be close to stealth.
Proof?
>Not to mention that with an IWB as seen by the current cutaway you would cut the total fuel in the central fuselage by more than hald and would requite a total rework.
They literally designed the fuselage with the iwb in mind though, which is why there's a space reserved for it.