>>715435871
>SKG won't happen because it would be asking companies to increase their costs
They've been cutting costs since forever, or doesn't anyone remember they started the "release game then layoffs for profit" as early as 2018, with the release of RDR2?
>It would be unreasonable to ask companies to change their server design process
As if their fucking servers haven't been replicated and reverse engineered for years now, this shit isn't the rocket science they want everyone to believe it is. Nowadays it must be a fucking docker image running the DB and a few APIs.
>It would limit their creative freedom
Hardware couldn't limit the creative freedom of the best designers and programmers this industry has seen, and that was decades ago.
The industry is full of fags and hacks that can't bring themselves to release an actually decent game even if their lives depended on it.
>EA
>Embracer group
>Epic
>Bamco
>Riot
>Supercell
>Actiblizz
>Fucking Ubisoft
These fags have done NOTHING but release live service trash and season pass bullshit for the past decade and yet they have the nerve to take a stand against this movement.
I hope these companies get buttfucked by a donkey in every way possible for being the dishonests fucks they are.