>>105658530
>>105658362
Well I'm sure it's well-researched and not a bunch of virtue signaling backed by a bunch of anecdotal garbage from thin-skinned retards who had a bad experience at a con once.
https://indieweb.org/code-of-conduct-why
>There's some evidence that the *absence* of an explicit Code of Conduct makes women question whether they should speak or even attend a conference. E.g. Noirin Plunkett's experience:
>Subsequently O'Reilly adopted a Code of Conduct and Noirin Plunkett did choose to attend and speak at OSCON.
>Also, if this uncertainty is the opinion of someone who is of the
>dominant demographic
>at tech conferences, ask them to ask any of their co-workers who are either not male, or not white, or not hetero if they think a public Code of Conduct will help or not, even a little.

oh nvm, it's literally just this comic, again.