>>936738129
No, you're specifically obfuscating the "test" that was "used" (it was an internet test).
>So whilst I am defending my IQ announcement, I will state that the approximate IQ average I attain on all recognised tests is around 133.
Lmao, why did you say it was 147, then?
>I am aware of the reasons why my real IQ as measured in a utopian future, is actually much higher. The knowledge I hold about utopian wisdom is greater than anyone I have ever met and until it is understood that a more accurate IQ test measures this phenomena, I will be stuck in the mediocrity of my peers, a slightly above high-order midwit to the system of scientific ethical betterment.
Why are you coping about "having" a 133 IQ average (on an internet test)?
>The children of inferior agendas run the downward flowing strategic failure to compute solutions
Let me get this straight: Are you talking about actual children or metaphorical ones?
>IQ does not measure memory capability, and it is possible to have a genetic predisposition to differences in long-term and short-term and relevance-based memory acquisition.
Yes it does. you can have small genetic differences, yes.
>There are things I do not know about this because I am isolated from the experts, and AI is not necessarily capable of issuing a highly accurate and unbiased response which resonates with my questions. But alas, I could ask.
Just contact an expert or read more stuff.