Search Results
!!0S1AUmI74TM/lgbt/40429295#40447946
7/20/2025, 8:30:47 PM
6/12/2025, 7:26:29 AM
Okay, back! That trip took a LOT out of me, more than I thought it would - it's been hard to even get on the computer. But I had fun!
>>39934409
Sorry I left ya hanging, anon. I hope you found the answers you needed.
Honestly, a LOOOT of context is missing here. Is this online? Offline? Did an argument happen? Being hard ignored is rough, but there could be a lot of reasons they went that route. It may not necessarily mean they don't care, but I'd say its very likely that for whatever reason they just don't have the energy to care enough. Do they have a lot going on in their lives? How close were you? Like, was this a best friend just ghosting you, or just an acquaintance? It's really really hard to draw conclusions.
I've definitely left people in the dark before - not often, because it's a sucky thing, but its happened. For me it was always a case of "life overwhelmed me and I was forced to pick and choose my battles". Something to remember with dealing with others is that they are always fighting battles you will never see.
Probably best not to think about it. If they want to talk, they'll probably talk.
>>39952389
>If something is a written message, it shouldn't matter whether you've taken attentive or not if you take the time to read it.
I kinda disagree. There are different ways to ingest written messages, and not everyone operates on the same basic level. Some people take everything at surface level unless prompted, while others will pick apart every detail and subtext they can. I've experienced that the former can lead to "inattentiveness", whilst the later can cause someone to draw false conclusions (no matter how analytical someone thinks they are, they aren't as good at is as they believe.)
I think it's a matter of reading the crowd - some conversations require you to look a bit deeper, and others can get you hurt if you read too deep.
>>39934409
Sorry I left ya hanging, anon. I hope you found the answers you needed.
Honestly, a LOOOT of context is missing here. Is this online? Offline? Did an argument happen? Being hard ignored is rough, but there could be a lot of reasons they went that route. It may not necessarily mean they don't care, but I'd say its very likely that for whatever reason they just don't have the energy to care enough. Do they have a lot going on in their lives? How close were you? Like, was this a best friend just ghosting you, or just an acquaintance? It's really really hard to draw conclusions.
I've definitely left people in the dark before - not often, because it's a sucky thing, but its happened. For me it was always a case of "life overwhelmed me and I was forced to pick and choose my battles". Something to remember with dealing with others is that they are always fighting battles you will never see.
Probably best not to think about it. If they want to talk, they'll probably talk.
>>39952389
>If something is a written message, it shouldn't matter whether you've taken attentive or not if you take the time to read it.
I kinda disagree. There are different ways to ingest written messages, and not everyone operates on the same basic level. Some people take everything at surface level unless prompted, while others will pick apart every detail and subtext they can. I've experienced that the former can lead to "inattentiveness", whilst the later can cause someone to draw false conclusions (no matter how analytical someone thinks they are, they aren't as good at is as they believe.)
I think it's a matter of reading the crowd - some conversations require you to look a bit deeper, and others can get you hurt if you read too deep.
Page 1