>>279963156
that's not true at all
newer stuff might be technically more advanced but restriction breeds creativity and the particular failures of today aren't like those of yesterday either, plus the percentage of dreadful seasonal filler is probably higher overall now (~95% --> 97%, which doesn't seem like a big shift but really is)
so you can often find very different hidden gems if you dig backward
and then there's the test of time which does lots of filtering for you and thus makes good old stuff more efficient to find