>>214001452
>Politically motivated retraction
You're coping hard. They literally gave the reasons for retraction:
>using student assessment studies as a measure of IQ or cognitive ability (as I said before)
>the prominence of individual examples taken from the author’s life
They literally let studies justifying pedophilia stay up if it holds up under rigorous peer review despite intense political backlash (Rind et al., controversy), but you think they'll take THIS down over "political pressure"? lol. lmao, even.