Thread 213998533

Why does this simple map make Timmies so buttblasted that they resort to citing studies from the 1960s and 1980s on fluoride-contaminated children, pulled from a self-professed cumskin nationalist’s self-published, non–peer-reviewed work in "Mankind Quarterly" (lmao), just to try and "debunk" it?
>bu-Buh thEse tESts aRe oNlY tAken bY InDiAnS wiTH aCCess to ComPutErs
So, are you admitting that the only way you can feel "superior" to Indians is by comparing yourself to malnourished, fluoride contaminated Indian children from the 1960s?

>>213998533 (OP)
>fluoride le bad
yeah you're one of the low-IQ ones

>>213998533 (OP)
>99 iq
>Can't shit in the toilet

They are so confident too in their pseudoscience. The entire idea is that whites are inherently smarter and thus have the right to inherit the world. In a way it’s our fault to even entertain these dimwits with a response. Russia was a backwater before the Soviets, the Chinese were addicted en masse to opium but now that they had actually competent leaders lead them you are going to backtrack and say they were always destined for greatness because muh IQ? Fuck off.

>>213998533 (OP)
What is the source?

>>213998620
Meh. It's the same as your people who have an IQ of 90, yet can't stop bathing in shit.

>>213998686
>Russia was a backwater before the Soviets
It wasn't, you have to be retarded to think so

>>213998703
>goes into the poo bath looking white
>comes out looking indian

MY SIDES

>>213998533 (OP)
>>bu-Buh thEse tESts aRe oNlY tAken bY InDiAnS wiTH aCCess to ComPutErs
Yeah I believe thats why this source is considered unreliable

>>213998686
Based Mesopotamian dropping his ancient wisdom.
We've always been fellow progenitors of civilizations who had good trade relations.

>>213998533 (OP)
>bu-Buh thEse tESts aRe oNlY tAken bY InDiAnS wiTH aCCess to ComPutErs
I mean that is a very good reason, no? If you manage to have a computer in Indistan you must be smarter than most.

There are two billion people in India. How many are counted here?

>>213998728
The entirety of Eastern Europe was. You had multiple families occupying the same house it was a fucking backwater because if it wasn’t WHAT WERE THEY REVOLTING AGAINST YOU FUCKING IDIOT???? muh ottoman imperialism muh devşirme but now that it benefits you you are going to say you were actually well off?

>>213998749
You need to stop diddling kids in Korea and GO BACK.

>>213998686
bro thought he could sneak in Russians as an example of high-IQ people lmao

>>213998686
>russians
>high IQ

What the fuck?

>>213998788
Only a very small subset of people who A. have a computer B. are interested in filling in IQ tests in their spare time

It's a classic example of selection bias

>>213998686
>The entire idea is that whites are inherently smarter
once/if india and africa achieves mass literacy and education, they'll have the same average IQ, but they're not there yet, so that's an argument against currently allowing them in our country

>>213998781
Your own sentence acknowledges that "most" Indians aren't smart enough to afford computers.

>>213998533 (OP)
I've seen this map before, what makes Iranians so smart? They're like the second highest IQ in the world

>>213998686
Both environment and IQ matters, not sure why this is so hard to understand.

>>213998855
Yes. That was very clearly intended. It shows that selection bias is taking place. What is your point?

>>213998781
The same logic applies to every country which takes that test, van der Berg.

SAARS I HATE THE WEST PLS LET ME IN

>>213998856
Selection bias. Its a voluntary online IQ test iranians who 1. have a computer 2. know how to set up a VPN can access it. That's an even stricter filter than for pajeets who don't need to set up a VPN

>>213998891
Believe it or nut but in western countries "people with computers" is the entire population and hence it's a more representative sample. For thirdies it's way more biased

But glad you agree that the map is unreliable you fucking retard. That's why you use IQ tests taken with a representative sample in a controlled setting you fucking freak of nature.

>>213998944
kek

>>213998791
>You had multiple families occupying the same house
Retard, that's a soviet thing
>WHAT WERE THEY REVOLTING AGAINST YOU FUCKING IDIOT
Most (95%) people weren't revolting

>>213998953
>in western countries "people with computers"
Glad you agree with me over the fact that "only people with computers" can take that test even in "the West".

>>213998998
So everyone? What is your point lmao

You need to stop seething.

This is not 100 IQ behavior

>>213999053
good morning saars do the needful and kindfully checking the same

>>213999045
Exactly. Now, THIS is high IQ behavior.

>>213998686
>The entire idea is that whites are inherently smarter and thus have the right to inherit the world.
Farce and strung-up justification though it may be, pretentious lies, like most such "inheritance" stuns.
But saying Russia is backwater? Assuming backtracking? Equalizing throwaway political rhetorics for plebs or party functionaires out of touch or too in touch with reality to entire populations?
No, sir, that ain't good.
Russia was much more complex than this even with its issues. It had its own backwaters, corruption, but it had its wins also.
China too has complex history, using a loss to a successful British psy-ops as some example of their fundamental, cosmological incompetence isn't merely laughable but defeatist as well.

An off-shoot of actual Sumerians that some of Iraqi are, such as the Marsh Arabs has no business lecturing others on utility of psy-ops tactics or even pseudoscience, as a bolster or as deep strat weapon to gimp industry.
You were really great millennia ago. But life's a grind.
They at least keep going.
Where have you been going?

pajeets have an H1B god lmfao

>>213999081
>comparing a guy who lost a dare vs your nation's sacred religious ritual

Timmies do this funny thing where they troll others by leaving little shit nuggets on the floor.
They call it "shit land mining".
Lovely high IQ culture, really.

>>213998849
The point isn’t immigration, it’s up to you whom you allow in your country. It’s about the idea that whites are in the position they are in right now precisely because of an intrinsic inherent value that others don’t possess. And for a long while IQ was used to that end. They would look at idk Bhutan with an IQ of 40 something and say surely that can’t be just bad methodology and surely that isn’t just the environment. Surely the Bhutanese are inherently worth less.

>>213999107
SAARS KINDLY WORSHIP THE H1B GOD
I HATE THE WEST BUT WANT TO LIVE THERE
LIVING IN INDIA IS HATE CRIME SAAR

>>213999194
Timmy, it looks like you blew your fuse.
Go fuck a dog or something to calm your nerves.

>>213999138
>uncommon behavior of using poo in a mean spirited prank

vs:

>common sacred ritual of using cow poop to cleanse your soul or whatever

do you really fail to see the difference? We do not revere poo. You do

>>213999229
You will never get a green card, Deepak

>>213999145
I mean, whites being in the position they are now is definitely at least partially due to IQ and genetics.

>>213999239
>poo in a mean spirited prank
It really is funny. I love white humour.
It's especially hilarious when you people shit on homeless men's faces, lmao.

>>213999323
Does it offend you that we use what is such a holy substance for you for joking matters?

>>213999352
Nah. I find it hilarious.

Getting real tired of all this malice regarding India, or India itself. You sinners sure love to suck morale out of anything and anyone.
No wonder finance wins time and time again so easily, you're all traitors and chumps. An excuse is all that's needed.

>>213999424
tsaaaaaaaaaaaaaar

>>213999424
>Getting real tired of all this malice regarding India

>>213999249
History has its ups and downs and so in the context of larger historical oscillations of power from one nation/group to another I am doubtful of attributing this modern oscillation of power in their direction to anything other than mere circumstance. The mere circumstance of their rise to power coinciding with the Industrial Revolution yielding the then unseen levels of global dominance.

Jeet population are undercounted. Probably around 2.75bn-3bn.

>>213998533 (OP)
Is mankind quarterly published by that Pioneer society something group?

>>213999500
Its a pretty general consensus that IQ and intelligence is at least partially genetic. I agree that enviornment and history can have an effect, but do you think there is no genetic element to European success whatsoever? Do you think if Australian Aboriginals lived in Europe instead then they would have been able to build the modern world like Europeans did?

>>213999444
>>213999446
I can make such mockery about almost any nation on Earth too, just like you do.
I don't, and I make no jokes with actual bad intent about it, because I don't like injustice, even if I don't do anything about it due to thus far incorrected partial cowardice and full incompetence. I admit it.

But you, for some reason are really quick to point fingers at others, in spite of the fact that you have your own problems.
Had you cared about them at all, compatriots, humans, life itself, you'd at least admit to yourself that you must if not pick up a sword, then to acknowledge the need to do so. Someone must take action in places where action is required.

So many of you, on all the boards and all the sites, no matter the age and no matter the nation prefer to laugh, instead of advancing, to insult instead of facing, to increase contempt instead of bravery, and to grow despair instead of hope.
Filthy hypocrites, traitors and cowards your lot are, continue to take accomplishments of humanity for granted and live out mediocre lives of vapid consumption. You deserve the transnational corporations.

>>213998533 (OP)
>bu-Buh thEse tESts aRe oNlY tAken bY InDiAnS wiTH aCCess to ComPutErs
so not a true iq test. 76.24 stays the true number

>>213999632
Here's what wikipedia says about Mankind Quarterly.
They publish groundbreaking research such as “Which race has the biggest dick?” “Which race fucks the most bitches?” “Which race is the best in bed?” etc.,

>>213999822
What exactly has your cunt contributed to science and humanity with that supposed high IQ of yours, Timmy? Outside of pedophiles, that is.

>>213999927
Yeah it's tangentially related to the Pioneer Fund, I couldn't remember the name

this raging jeet must have a trauma or something

>>214000022
>country of 40 million that has existed for 150 years vs country of 1.5 trillion that has existed for 2000

Your mathematical track record is dissapointed when taking into account your size. Your most well known mathematician is low B/high C tier and was schooled in Britain, not India.

>>213999784
I don’t think I can attribute the European success to their specific genetic makeup in light of the historical context just mentioned. Perhaps the Australian Aboriginals would have been as successful had they had the same “white experience”, the circumstances I have alluded to. To me the European success is attributable to a whirlwind of different factors uniting and yielding the dynamics that allowed the Europeans to dominate. These circumstances, that uniquely white experience, I view as a chain of actions and reactions. The spread of Christianity is a part of this uniquely white experience and perhaps in association with other factors yielded, in this instance, their dominant position, but Christianity is a Semitic religion. That is to say this uniquely white experience is white in-so-far as the people that were subjected to it were white. In short, had the circumstances been the same, I think the aboriginals would have been just as successful.

>>214000283
Ramanujan was not "schooled" in Britain, retard. He barely stayed there for 5 years before dying of food poisoning from the disgusting, shit-infested "food" over there.

>>213998533 (OP)
>citing studies from the 1960s and 1980s
...continuing all the way to the present day
>self-published, non–peer-reviewed
they were peer reviewed, and the national Q samples themselves were often taken from peer reviewed research, and other international IQ scores finding the same results like Lim et al were peer reviewed https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)31941-X/fulltext
>"Mankind Quarterly"
The same results were also found independently by the worldwide bank. see pic related https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1831855224044355853/photo/1

Lynn's 2002 national IQ results (which he gathered using IQ test samples that were collected by other psychologists) correlate 0.82 with world bank harmonised learning outcomes data and lynn's 2012 results correlate at 0.88 with the world bank data.

>>214000283
Size doesn't matter

>>213998533 (OP)
>>214000482
Furthermore , national IQ scores correlate very highly with international scholastic assessments like PISA
Becker and Rindermann continued Lynn's national IQ score database and published a 2018 update that correlates 0.8 with PISA scores
https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1694794239605866923

>>213998686
>Russia was a backwater
and despite that they greatly contributed to many fields like literature and maths

>>214000465
>and perhaps in association with other factors
Like IQ

>>213998533 (OP)
>>214000482
>>214000515

Furthermore, Lynn and Becker's 2018 national IQ intelligence scores (labelled "Intelligence" in pic related https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1793408297648959738/photo/1) correlate almost perfectly with international intelligence scores found by many other sources including student achievement investigated for the world bank by Angrist et al https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03323-7 , NAtional IQ scores collected by Lim et al https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)31941-X/fulltext , student achievement and basic skills by Gust et al for the institute of labour economics https://docs.iza.org/dp15648.pdf and adult ability PIAAC survey done by the OECD https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/skills-matter_9789264258051-en.html

So clearly Lynn's results finding that third worlders are LOW IQ match multiple other international assessments of cognitive ability performed by by international organisations like the World bank, OECD, institute for labour economics and others.

https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1793408297648959738/photo/1

>>214000597
same results but in raw rather than correlation again showing that Lynn and Becker's 2018 results (labelled Intelligence [35]) find basically the same result as other international cognitive tests.
https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1793408297648959738/photo/1

>>214000531
IQ is specific to the European genetic makeup?
I don’t have any reason to believe that aboriginal IQ wouldn’t have come out the same, give or take, granted the same circumstances. There just isn’t that drastic of a genetic difference.

>>214000482
>continuing all the way to the present day
Wouldn't you like that, timmy?
>they were peer reviewed
They were individually "peer-reviewed," but not as a meta-analysis. They were not accepted as the "representative population" of the country.
I can post hundreds of "peer reviewed" studies which show very high-scoring samples for Indians as well:
Here are the studies:
Lucknow Area (SA Khan 2015): Village school kids' avg. IQ = 110 (normal fluoride), 100 (overall, including high fluoride areas). High fluoride negatively impacts IQ.
Source: https://www.jcdr.net/article_fulltext.asp?issn=0973-709x&year=2015&month=November&volume=9&issue=11&page=ZC10&id=6726
Aligarh Muslims (Badaruddoza study): Avg. IQ = 107 (Based on 2004 study using 1974 norms). Flynn Effect (FE) correction stated as ≥ +0.54; corrected IQ ~108.
Source: http://hrcak.srce.hr/file/44025
Chennai (2006 study): Community sample (n=717, mostly lower SES - 606 families <6500 INR/month, 130 illiterate mothers) avg. IQ = 107 (Using 1967 norms). FE correction stated as ≥ -0.9; corrected IQ ≥106.1.
Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3018494/
Punjab (2016 study): Avg. IQs (Using 1979 norms): Rural areas = 96.2, 90.4; Urban areas = 102, 106. FE correction stated as ≥ +2.47; corrected IQs: Rural ≥98.7, 92.7; Urban ≥104.5, 108.5.
Source: http://www.ijres.org/papers/Volume%204/v4-i7/Version-2/G4724854.pdf
West Bengal (Rural, 2015 study): Laxmisagar village avg. IQ = 108.3 (normal fluoride), 85–92 (high fluoride areas). (Using 1989 norms). FE correction stated as ≥ +1.73; corrected IQs: ≥110.03 (normal Fluoride), 86.7-93.7 (high Fluoride contamination).
Source:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297722925

>>214000471
I wasn't talking about ramanujan retard. He was a low C list who died of his own stupidity. Normal britons didn't have a vitamin deficiency

>>214000724
And I can post several low-scoring samples for China as well:
Wang, 2001 (Average IQ of 76-81) Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/wang-2001.pdf Average IQ: 81 and 76
Hong, 2001 (Average IQ of 65-82) Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/hong-2001.pdf Average IQ fluctuates between 65 and 82 for China, depending on the amount of fluoride in water. Shandong province, China.
Li, 1995 (Average IQ of 79-89) Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/li-1995.pdf Average IQ is in between 79 and 89 for China. Guizhou province, China.
Yang, 1994 (Average IQ of 76,81) Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/yang-1994.pdf Average IQ for China is 76 and 81. Jinan, China.
An, 1992 (Average IQ of 76,84) Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/an-1992.pdf Average IQ for China is 76 and 84. Guyana county, Inner Mongolia.
Guo, 1991 (Average IQ of 76,81) Source: http://www.fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/guo-1991.pdf Average IQ for China is 76 and 81. Hunan province, China.

>>214000718
IQ is genetic partially. So yes, all groups would not react exactly the same to the same circumstances.

>>214000718
Mate have you ever met an abo? I am willing to tolerate some form of relativism when it comes to this shit, but abos, niggers and jeets have a very specific mental retardation that becomes immediately clear when you spend a minute around them

>>213998533 (OP)
IQ is a cope desu I dont believe in it. The development difference between countries is much larger than the difference in IQ. Of course countries that do not even have clean water have lower IQ on average, like that is a pretty meaningless fact

>>214000597
>https://x.com/charlesmurray/status/1793201174172057936
Congratulations on posting a literal RETRACTED paper, dumbfuck.
A fantastic display of your "high IQ" right here.

POO IN A LOO

>>214000799
Also my fav is when they do this
>Oh Jews have just giga IQ that is why they own all the media everywhere in the world
There are more (white) people with genius IQ than there are jews in the world in TOTAL, the people who use this argument make a statistical mistake that should not fool a 5th grader lol

>>214000784
But you are grasping at straws here. what difference does a few IQ points make in the grand scheme of things? What difference would it make if the Abos, with a few less IQ points, are the ones to show up on the coasts of Africa with guns?

Youre all the bottom outliers dragging down the average, not sure why youre all so keen on discussing IQ when its obviously your one of the many weak points. You're not misunderstood genius outcasts, you're all ugly dysgenic cretins and society should thank m00t for creating 4chan and preventing you all from raping someone.

>>214000724
>Source: https://www.jcdr.net/article_fulltext.asp?issn=0973-709x&year=2015&month=November&volume=9&issue=11&page=ZC10&id=6726
if you actually read this study and check out all the other ones referenced in it, you'll discover that the average IQ is somewhat below 90, AT BEST
also
>sponsored by the government
even if you managed to irrefutably prove indian street shitter retarded children have an average IQ of 120, thet're still disgusting filthy jeets

>>214000756
>>214000724
Ok, so is your claim that not just Lynn, Becker , Vanhanen and Rindermann but PISA, the world bank, Lim et al. the OECD, and the institute of labour economics are all conspiring to artificially lower India's scores on cognitive tests and inflate China's scores on cognitive tests?

>>214000930
You need to stop raping kids in Bali and get the fuck back to your shithole, you mart sharting, dog fucking, school shooting, inbred cumskin.

>>214000912
Yeah, and thats why I said IQ was one of the factors, you were the one saying IQ basically had no effect whatsoever. Also the IQ difference between whites and aboriginals is not small.

>>214000973
>Lynn, Becker , Vanhanen and Rindermann
All the same cumskin supremacists in mankind quarterly.
>PISA
Not administered in the native language of those kids. And it doesn't measure "Fluid IQ". It measures the quality of education (if administered in their native language).
>the world bank, Lim et al. the OECD
They cite the same PISA results of India from 2009.
>China
Doesn't allow PISA tests on its representative population. Next.

>>213998701
racist eurocentric bullshit.

>>214001052
Look at your own people raping children in Rotterham, Oxford, Rochdale, Derby, Preston

>>214000808
Politically motivated retraction. The "post publication peer review" , which occurred AFTER the journal "Discover Education" had already peer reviewed the paper prior to publication couldn't state specifically what crucial flaws the paper had and never made the "post publication peer review" public.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384324296_Comment_on_the_retraction_of_the_article_Surprisingly_low_results_by_Discover_Education

So basically come leftoids contacted the journal after the journal had already peer reviewed the paper and pressured them to retract the paper because they're offended by the idea that the low IQ score results for third world countries are valid but they couldn't demonstrate what specifically was wrong with the paper.

It's undeniable that the findings of the other papers published by the world bank, the OECD, the institute of labour economics, Lim et al. and Lynn and Becker are all extremely closely correlated. The results of all those other papers are peer-reviewed and publicly available so anyone else can show that they are correlated , such as >>214000482
and >>214000515

looks like you're looking for excuses to ignore the fact that Lynn and Becker's IQ results correlate with other measures of cognitive ability collected by other researchers and organisations.

>>214001052
saaaaar I'm not rapist saaar
>*steals a macbook after passed the immigration checks*

>>214000952
>if you actually read this study and check out all the other ones referenced in it, you'll discover that the average IQ is somewhat below 90, AT BEST
Not really. See Figure 5. Can't you even read simple papers?

>>214001452
>Politically motivated retraction
You're coping hard. They literally gave the reasons for retraction:
>using student assessment studies as a measure of IQ or cognitive ability (as I said before)
>the prominence of individual examples taken from the author’s life
They literally let studies justifying pedophilia stay up if it holds up under rigorous peer review despite intense political backlash (Rind et al., controversy), but you think they'll take THIS down over "political pressure"? lol. lmao, even.

>>214000718
>IQ is specific to the European genetic makeup?
No, the different versions of a gene which contribute towards a high IQ score are the most common in ashkenazi jews (average IQ 108), then in north east asians (average IQ 105), then in Europeans(average IQ 100), then in muslim countries and indians (average IQ 80-90) then in subsaharan africans (average IQ 70-80 , or 85 for african americans who are 25% European ancestry on average)

Here is are the different lines of evidence that demonstrate this
https://scholarlypublishingcollective.org/uip/ajp/article-abstract/134/4/480/291766/Between-Group-Mean-Differences-in-Intelligence-in?redirectedFrom=fulltext
https://the-boomer-tribune.medium.com/human-racial-and-ethnic-populations-and-differences-in-iq-scores-3cdd2b5cabe

>I don’t have any reason to believe that aboriginal IQ wouldn’t have come out the same, give or take, granted the same circumstances.

australian families used to adopt aboriginal infants, almost none of achieved high qualified, IQ demanding careers like doctors, scientists, engineers, lawyers, etc. IIRC there's only one full-blooded aboriginal who managed to be a legit scientist and he thought that aboriginals intellectually capable of doing scientific research were much rarer than Europeans, but I can't remember his name. By contrast when white families adopt east asian children they become extremely successful and high IQ.

>There just isn’t that drastic of a genetic difference.
There doesn't need to be. humans are 99.9% identical in our dna, so 3 million base pairs commonly vary, but differences in the frequency of only a few hundred or few thousand gene variants (i.e. single nucleotide polymorphisms, places where a base pair can be different) can make a huge difference to average IQ between groups.

>Saar I am high IQ (98) but also IQ was invented by cumskin colonizers to supress indigenous ways of knowing
Which is it, Rishi?

shitdians probably cheated on those tests. just as they cheat on everything else.

>>214001908
>https://scholarlypublishingcollective.org/uip/ajp/article-abstract/134/4/480/291766/Between-Group-Mean-Differences-in-Intelligence-in?redirectedFrom=fulltext
A paywalled article with only 200 or so downloads which I'm 100% sure you yourself haven't read.
>https://the-boomer-tribune.medium.com/human-racial-and-ethnic-populations-and-differences-in-iq-scores-3cdd2b5cabe
>A bumfuck non–peer-reviewed article that uses more non–peer-reviewed "studies" by Lynn to make its point
kek. Every. Single. Time.
Cumskins really just can't help themselves, can they?

>>214002086
Most scientific articles are paywalled ranjeet

>>213998686
My Chinese gf is very smart, she’s probably double your IQ and much cuter.

>>214002555
>>214002086
Technically not, since academics are happy to provide copies on request.

>>214001183
>All the same cumskin supremacists in mankind quarterly.
aka "I desperately need an excuse to ignore their findings, which are drawn from IQ samples collected by other psychologists , and which correlate strongly with other international cognitive assessments "

>>PISA
>Not administered in the native language of those kids.

? pic related

>it doesn't measure "Fluid IQ".
Ravens progressive matrices, which are used to measure "fluid IQ" correlate strongly with PISA scores see table 1 https://gwern.net/doc/iq/2021-pokropek.pdf
"The finding that PISA achievement scores reflect mostly g, which may arise because PISA aims to test broad abilities in a variety of contexts or may be a general characteristic of LSAs and national achievement tests."
>>the world bank, Lim et al. the OECD
>They cite the same PISA results of India from 2009.
Right , right, PISA is conspiring to keep India down sar
Also, no the OECD study doesn't use PISA, it uses Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies , the results of which are correlated 0.92 with Lynn and Becker's 2018 national IQ scores, and which indicate that third world countries have an average IQ of 84

>>214001183
>>China
>Doesn't allow PISA tests on its representative population.
Maybe, but there's other reasons to believe that chinese people are high IQ besides PISA scores, like The fact that the chinese population allele distribution has a high average polygenic scores for IQ and educational attainment, which correlate 0.9 with national IQ scores pic related
https://www.mdpi.com/2624-8611/1/1/5

>>213998533 (OP)
>Peruvian indios IQ mog shitstizos, pardos and cuckstizos
I kneel

>>213998533 (OP)
Average IQ is always 100.

>>214003349
>Ravens progressive matrices, which are used to measure "fluid IQ" correlate strongly with PISA scores see table 1
Yeah, sure. And ALL the researchers agree with that. That's probably the reason they retracted this >>214001890 study for using test scores as a proxy for IQ or cognitive ability, amirite?
>Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies
Which India NEVER took part in. Fantastic. Such high IQ arguments, much wow.
>>214003369
>The fact that the chinese population allele distribution has a high average polygenic scores for IQ
Ching chong ping pong aieee. Cope >>214000756.

>>214001890
>>You're coping hard.
And yet they refuse to publicly release the peer review supposedly prompting the paper's retraction , which is standard.

>>using student assessment studies as a measure of IQ or cognitive ability

This is a vague claim which doesn't demonstrate which specific claims in the paper are wrong.
PISA assessments do to a large degree measure g aka IQ so you can use PISA assessments in estimating national IQs.

https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10151149/1/Pokropek_Marks_Borgonovi_Kock_Greiff_RPS.pdf
>The symmetrical bifactor general ability model shows that 80%, or more, of the common variance in student responses to the PISA instruments is accounted for by a general ability factor

Which matches why the various papers measuring international differences in cognitive ability have such closely correlated results >>214000597

>>the prominence of individual examples taken from the author’s life
including a couple of illustrative anecdotes has literally nothing to do with the results showing the correlation between various measured of international differences in cognitive ability >>214000597

>>214001890
>>214004102

>They literally let studies justifying pedophilia stay up if it holds up under rigorous peer review despite intense political backlash (Rind et al., controversy), but you think they'll take THIS down over "political pressure"?
Of course. advocating for pedophilia is far less unpopular in academia than hereditarian models for IQ differences between different racial groups . the proof is that branches of academia like queer theory do advocate for pedophilia and experience no professional backlash or retraction or firing, such as the famous and lauded scholars mentioned in this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cb3-tlyuhVo&t=2m (skip to 2 minutes in)
On the other hand hereditarian scholars like Bryan Pesta, Bo Winegard, Noah Carl, Nathan Cofnas and many others have either been fired or attempted to be fired for publishing or discussing results that indicate racial differences in IQ and a genetic cause.

>>214002086
>A paywalled article
You can easily find a non-pay walled version if you don't have institutional access , you just google the paper title and it's the first result
https://gwern.net/doc/iq/2021-warne-2.pdf
>only 200 or so downloads
Totally irrelevant to whether the facts and citations are true and the arguments are valid. Notice how the people denying national IQ results and denying evidence that racial IQ differences are substantially caused by DNA is always willing to use logically fallacies to avoid engaging with the arguments and evidence.
It's obvious why they use these tactics, it's because they know that the facts aren't in their favour and so need excuses to avoid having to acknowledge the facts and evidence.
e.g.
>he's a nazi
ad hominem. the truth value of a scientific statement doesn't change depending on who says it, whether a scientific statement should be believed to be true or false depends on the evidence
>which I'm 100% sure you yourself haven't read.
I have read it, and you're just telling on yourself here. You're brazenly admitting that you're automatically dismissing the paper as false without reading it.
Which shows what a motivated reasoner you are.


>>https://the-boomer-tribune.medium.com/human-racial-and-ethnic-populations-and-differences-in-iq-scores-3cdd2b5cabe
>>A bumfuck non–peer-reviewed article
Another logical fallacy. Whether a scientific statement is true or not doesn't depend on where the article is published , whether there is good reason to consider a scientific statement true or not depends on the evidence and arguments provided. You are looking for an excuse not to engage with the evidence and arguments because you know that the facts are not on your side and you are not able to refute the arguments.

>uses more non–peer-reviewed "studies"
Actually the vast majority of studies linked to are peer reviewed , or use publicly available data-sets
>by lynn
and dozens of other scientists

>>214002086

It's very flattering that you run away and refuse to engage with the arguments and evidence of
https://gwern.net/doc/iq/2021-warne-2.pdf
or
https://the-boomer-tribune.medium.com/human-racial-and-ethnic-populations-and-differences-in-iq-scores-3cdd2b5cabe
because it shows that you know that you can't refute their evidence and arguments and can't show that their results are false.

>>214003556
>>Ravens progressive matrices, which are used to measure "fluid IQ" correlate strongly with PISA scores see table 1
>Yeah, sure. And ALL the researchers agree with that.

"I can't refute the empirically established fact that fluid IQ correlates strongly with PISA scores , so I'm going to make up some appeal to "all researchers" which I pulled out of my ass."

Wow that's great cope.
So I can just say "all researchers agree that you're wrong and your mum has AIDS" and proves my point too.

>>That's probably the reason they retracted this >>214001890 study for using test scores as a proxy for IQ or cognitive ability, amirite?
If they had a valid reason to retract the study for "post publication peer review" AFTER the study already passed the journal's pre-publication peer review process, then they'd make the post publication peer review publicly available.
They know that they can't provide any specifics about what crucial errors the paper made and why exactly it's wrong, because the more specific the claim/argument, the more easily it's refuted by other evidence like >>214003349

>>Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies
>Which India NEVER took part in.
And? It still correlates very highly with the rest of the international measures of cognitive ability >>214000597 which increases the level of credence of the validity of those other international measures of cognitive ability, which all say that indians are fairly low IQ

Your racial group's genes also have fairly bad polygenic scores for IQ and educational attainment see >>214003369

>>214003556
>>214005308

>>The fact that the chinese population allele distribution has a high average polygenic scores for IQ
>Ching chong ping pong aieee. Cope
so basically you have no counter explanation for the fact that china's , as well as other north east asian nations, genes score highly on polygenic scores for IQ and educational attainment.
This is clearly evidence indicating that north east asians have good genes for IQ, but you want us to ignore these results as a pure coincidence and instead focus on some of he provinces which do have low average IQ rather than looking at the whole of china
https://wcipeg.com/etc/brian/China_IQ_by_province.svg
The provinces with the lower IQs tend to have lower population density and lower % Han

>>213998533 (OP)
Damn these russian bots are working overtime

>>213998791
Brother you are as retarded as they come. As anywhere in the world in the whole of history,it is not the common people that started the rebelion,rather it was the serbian elites that survived the purge of the counts that started the first serbian uprising.

>>214004102
>https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10151149/1/Pokropek_Marks_Borgonovi_Kock_Greiff_RPS.pdf
Congratulations, ching chong. You played yourself. The very same study you referenced adds two caveats
1. It's CRYSTALLIZED IQ which measures accumulated knowledge, NOT FLUID IQ, which measures problem solving ability, is inherent and is not dependent on education.
2. CRYSTALLIZED IQ can only be compared across groups IF both of them receive the same quality of education and educational resources.
You now understand why that paper was retracted.
>>214004134
>Ching chong trying to unironically explain to me how pedophilia is actually less controversial than race and IQ because muh queers
Rind et al., got unanimous condemnation from both chambers of the United States Congress. You cannot get more "controversial" than that.
>>214005308
>fluid IQ correlates strongly with PISA scores
I'm sure it does, ching chong. None of your papers have proven that, by the way.
>And?
Thanks for conceding that India did, in fact, never participate in Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies and that you were being disingeuous.

>>214005353
>This is clearly evidence indicating that north east asians have good genes for IQ
kek. I'm sure you do, ching chong.
https://r.jordan.im/download/racism/bird2021.pdf
That's probably why you contributed so much more to civilization and science compared to India such as:
>The Hindu numerals (0-9) with place-value notation
>a concept so fundamental that it's literally the first Mathematical concept taught to kindergarteners
>forms the foundation of modern arithmetic: used in every calculator, grocery bill, credit card payment, large numbers, binary computing, and digital technology (can't do any of this shit with Roman numerals)
>x + (−x) = 0 made standard
>paves the way for algebra and daily applications like finance and engineering
>solutions for linear and quadratic equations
>establishes the basis of modern numeric routines
>Aryabhata advances trigonometry and algebra
>introduces sine tables and systematic approaches to solving equations
>Kuttaka method provides solutions for Diophantine equations
>lays groundwork for modular arithmetic
>underpins cryptography, secure transactions, and PIN systems
>Bhaskara II’s “Lilavati” covers arithmetic, algebra, geometry, and combinatorics
>foundation for interest calculations, construction, and everyday tasks
>Chakravala method solves Pell’s equation, is an early step in public-key cryptography
>Madhava and Kerala School work out infinite series for π, sine, and cosine
>Pioneer calculus (series representation) centuries before Newton
>critical for modern analytics, weather models, and rocket guidance
Oh, wait! Were they all Indian contributions? And the Chinese contributed nothing? Aww, shucks!

.

someone post that israeli stink cannon that work well against palestinians because the stench was horrific but when used in india it was completely useless because the people didn't mind the smell

>>214004102
https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10136599/1/Borgonovi_RPS_JEdPsy.pdf
Also, here's another paper disproving the correlation between PISA scores and fluid IQ.
>For Poland, the latent correlations between
Raven's progressive matrices, a measure of fluid intelligence, and PISA test scores in Poland were around 0.73 (Pokropek et al., 2021)

>>214009896
kekw that's hilarious.
Jeets are so STINKY lmao.

>>214004102
https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10136599/1/Borgonovi_RPS_JEdPsy.pdf
Also, here's another paper disproving the correlation between PISA scores and fluid IQ.
>For Poland, the latent correlations between Raven's progressive matrices, a measure of fluid intelligence, and PISA test scores in Poland were around 0.73 (Pokropek et al., 2021)

>>214010179
cmon you know nobody's believing these fake statistics right? stereotypes don't just appear out of the blue, you guys stank it up bad

>>214010265
Agreed. So STINKY.

>>214010342
>mud is the same as shit
kek dumb jeet, your entire country and culture revolves around feces
this is just a regular google image one of the first results when you write "river ganges"

>>214010504
>Sewage and poop is the same as mud
High IQ cumskin intellect right here.

>>214010598
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3xnrbzfOiYE

I dare you to find a video of any other ethnicity having a literal stinky poo jeet shit battle.

Pajeet with hat.

Indians living up to their "SHITskin" name

>>214010637
And I dare you to find another ethnicity with a dung spitting battle.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KRS5LRcowcg

Cumskin eats shit.

>>214010742
Indian doctor eats SHIT, says it's delicious and good for you
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ds_2G31gMnA

Smelliest nation on Earth having the smelliest battle

>>214010817
Cumskin smears shit to entertain her fellow cumskins.

India’s top medical association warns over ‘health risks’ of using cow dung as Covid treatment.

https://www.independent.co.uk/asia/india/india-covid-cow-dung-cure-b1845507.html

>>214010854
Cumskins also tend to troll their police officers by shitting on them, kek. Lovely culture, really.

>>214010895
The average cumskin first dates are just too entertaining.

Indians literally drinking piss and shit to fight diseases, covering their already shit-colored skins with actual feces.

>>214010958
And they fling shit at the waitstaff, lmao.
Funniest shit ever (pun intended).
God, I wish I was cum skinned. Life would be so much fun.

Indian man washing his face in the morning.

>A cumskin walks a dog down the street.
>At a lamp post the leash slackens and it squats for a moment to take a shit.
>When the moment passes, they simply stroll on.
>The dog sighs.
>“Every morning you drag me out so you can poop in public, and somehow I am still the one everyone blames.”

>>213998796
Every accusation is a confession by Timmy. He knows his people fuck animals,rape ,groom and kill the most so he keeps pushing his bs so no one suspects.

It’s in their blood

>>213998533 (OP)
This map is bullshit. No way Finland is lower iq than Russia. Especially considering the fact they have places like Dagestan.

Indian birthday cake.

Can't make this shit up, actual photos.

>>213998533 (OP)
How do i upvote on this racist website?

Indian woman having a shower with wet cow shit mixed with water.

This is a standard practice in India. These are the guys calling you "cumskin".

Timmy comes with the goods.

>>213998533 (OP)
In what world do Nordics have the same IQ as nafris???

>>213999053
Kek based
Add troons, for a dying billion they hot so many sexual fucked up behaviours
These guys can’t even quit porn or dapping for a month

Indian man eats traditional Indian food.

Cumskin bathes in sewage.

This is a standard practice in cumskinland. These are the guys calling you "pajeet".

>>213999118
Nords love eating shit and drinking piss

>>214011155
They certainly do.

>>213999323
Dutchman feeding a German
Eu values

Indian men applying cow shit to their shit-skins.

This is not crazy people in delirium, this is not a rare thing, it's not a taboo. This is seen as standard practice in India.

Therefore an Indian should never get insulted when someone calls him a shitskin, because he's statistically most likely to have shit applied to his skin when you talk to him.

Indian woman applying wet cow shit for the shit-covered male to worship on.

Cumskins having a lavish feast of shit.

>>214001052
Based. Wiggers been doing this for decades and they sweep it under the rug

Indians having a shit in traditional Indian toilet.

Based thread

>>214011309
They love sweeping shit under the rug, lmao.

Prayers of Cow Dung: Women Sculpturing Fertile Environments in Rural Rajasthan (India)

kek at this thread

Shart. In. Mart.

https://www.newsflare.com/video/342862/to-protect-themselves-from-coronavirus-these-indians-are-bathing-in-cow-dung

Video of traditional Indian jacuzzi.

>>214001265
Nothing in comparison to sexpats in other third world, Epstein island and the church

Rookie numbers. Plus Rotherham was enabled by some white cops and judges that partook in it. Thought you guys called it progressive
You Nords even had legal cp back in the 70s
Easy to false accuse minority men. But whites can pay Goldberg to get out of it

Cumskin doing the sneaky in her designated sharting isle.

Here is top 10 bathing nation of India.

>>214011454
This one's not so sneaky.

>>214010265
A lot of it is gaslighting
You got cuck fantasy

>we were low IQ because of Britisher fluoride saaaar

New Pajeet cope just dropped

>>213998686
White superiority will always cause endless brown seethe.

>>214007758
>>214007758
>>214007758
>>https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10151149/1/Pokropek_Marks_Borgonovi_Kock_Greiff_RPS.pdf
>Congratulations, ching chong. You played yourself. The very same study you referenced adds two caveats
>1. It's CRYSTALLIZED IQ which measures accumulated knowledge, NOT FLUID IQ, which measures problem solving ability, is inherent and is not dependent on education.

this study https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10151149/1/Pokropek_Marks_Borgonovi_Kock_Greiff_RPS.pdf
does not mention 'crystallized IQ" whatsoever , you're just making things up. What it exames is general ability factor aka g factor aka intelligence.

If the PISA results simply measured "accumulated knowledge" then the model that models PISA results as simply specific reading , science and mathematics abilities would perform better than the symmetrical bifactor model that includes g, but in reality the symmetrical bifactor model including g modelled the results much better.

>This paper examines to what extent the instrumentsin the PISA 2018 study met these assumptions by examining the role of general ability in shaping individual variation in response patterns in the PISA test. The general ability factor is generally referred to as 'general academic ability' by education specialists and 'intelligence' by psychologists. The primary purpose of the paper is to investigate to what extent the PISA 2018 assessment measured general ability vis-`avis domain-specific knowledge and skills, analysing data from 33 OECD countries.
HMMM sounds like they're testing whether PISA measures general ability aka intelligence or accumulated knowledge!
[...]
cont .

>>214011352
Did you know despite being 1/8 of world population they make 99% of beastility porn. Goatse used to be their meme and call everyone dog or sheep fuckers.

Bet they started aids in the 80s by fucking a monkey then spread it in Africa . Before that millions of years no tribesmen did that

>>214007758
>>214011652
>The AIC values indicate that the symmetrical bifactor model outperforms the two other models in all countries and by a considerable margin in the great majority of countries.

>For the symmetric bifactor model, the ECV values are high, around 0.8 or more. This means that the general factor accounts for 80% or more of the common variance in item responses. Therefore, a simpler unidimensional model would fit the data nearly as well the symmetric bifactor model.

>2. CRYSTALLIZED IQ can only be compared across groups IF both of them receive the same quality of education and educational resources.
>You now understand why that paper was retracted.
Compared in what way? The idea that IQ cannot be compared whatsoever between two groups unless they receive the same education would insinuate that IQ totally loses it's predictive power between two or more groups unless they have received the same education.
But this is false. Despite the fact that different nations provide different educations to its children, IQ can still be used to predict both individual and group outcomes better than random guessing so the idea that IQ doesn;t measure anything unless both groups had the exact same education is wrong.

The whole reasons that economists use PISA scores in their estimations of national cognitive ability scores such as the world bank, the institute of labour economics, and the OECD >>214000597 is because these estimations of national cognitive ability aka human capital aka intelligence are successful at predicting national growth and other outcomes.

>>214011574
>>214011614
No you just backstabbed anyone dumb enough to trust you.
Japan and Afghanistan were smart

>>213998533 (OP)
the chinese number is 100000000000% legit, real and verified

>>214007758
>>214011652
>>214011689

>>Ching chong trying to unironically explain to me how pedophilia is actually less controversial than race and IQ because muh queers
>Rind et al., got unanimous condemnation from both chambers of the United States Congress.
controversial by mainstream politics standards, but not controversial by both mainstream politics standards and the standards of academia.
advocating for pedophilia is actually quite trendy and accepted within academia as shown by the fact that branches of academia like queer theory do advocate for pedophilia and experience no professional backlash or retraction or firing, such as the famous and lauded scholars mentioned in this video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cb3-tlyuhVo&t=2m (skip to 2 minutes in)
Rind only got backlash because his research became noticed by mainstream politicians.
This shows that it is is very feasible to advocate for pedophilia as an academic and not receive any professional backlash to your career or the publication of your papers, but if you do research on the hereditarian model for racial IQ gaps then professional backlash and publication are almost-certain outcomes because the idea that not all races have the same genetic predisposition for intelligence is so much more unpopular among academics than the idea that pedophilia can be a good thing.

>>214007758
>>214011652
>>214011689
>>214011728

>>fluid IQ correlates strongly with PISA scores
>I'm sure it does, ching chong. None of your papers have proven that, by the way.
https://gwern.net/doc/iq/2021-pokropek.pdf
>This is the first study replicating the PISA’s multidimensional model supplemented by Raven’ ability test scores, measure of fluid intelligence.
>The average correlation of the PISA factors in 2009 and 2010 with the Raven’s factor was the same (r = .73).
retard.

BTW , the idea that fluid IQ is the only thing that matters because you're purely testing reasoning ability without requiring any pre-requisite knowledge is invalid. If you only test "pure" reasoning ability then you're going to miss other important parts of general cognitive ability like desire to acquire knowledge , which will tend to result in becoming capable of solving a wide range of problems.

Intelligence is best thought of as the ability to solve a wide range of problems , which you won't be able to do if you only have reasoning ability no interest in acquiring or retaining useful knowledge that will let you solve a wider range of problems.

>>214011652
Just read this >>214010213 paper, ching chong.
When explicitly tested, the correlation between fluid IQ and PISA test scores only turns out to be 0.73.

>>214007758
>>214011652
>>214011689
>>214011728
>>214011765

>Thanks for conceding that India did, in fact, never participate in Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies and that you were being disingeuous.
This does not change the fact that It still correlates very highly with the rest of the international measures of cognitive ability >>214000597 which increases the level of credence of the validity of those other international measures of cognitive ability, which all say that indians are fairly low IQ
Your racial group's genes also have fairly bad polygenic scores for IQ and educational attainment see >>214003369

>>214007937

>https://r.jordan.im/download/racism/bird2021.pdf
Doesn't replicate. Other researchers did find evidence of natural selection for SNPs identified by older polygenic scores for educational attainment (EA2) in the 1000G sample , see table 1
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04191-y#Sec2

Piffer also used found evidence of selection on the polygenic score for educational attainment EA3 using the Fst enrichment method
https://openpsych.net/files/papers/Piffer_2021a.pdf

>That's probably why you contributed so much more to civilization and science compared to India such as:
>blah blah cherry picking from thousands of years of history like typical low IQ indian instead of examining comparable metrics
India has 1.4 billion people and 4 scientific nobel prizes https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Indian_Nobel_laureates , china has 1.4 billion people and 10 scientific nobel prizes. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_Nobel_laureates

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/2000-years-economic-history-one-chart/
pic related?
India can't grow? China is returning to it's position as world economic superpower it had prior to the period of European outperformance 600 years ago. India isn't. Sad!

>>214011689
Mensa is the authority on IQ estimation and they make sure the metric bear no leaning on acquired knowledge.

>>214011823
There is no correlation between mUh polYGeniC sCores and IQ >>214007937. This theory has long been debunked in psychology.

>>214007937
Maybe India can't grow like China because of IQ problems caused by inbreeding! sad!

>>214011721
You can always go back to your country you dumb streetshitting "international student"

>>214010213
>>214010213

>https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10136599/1/Borgonovi_RPS_JEdPsy.pdf
>Also, here's another paper disproving the correlation between PISA scores and fluid IQ.
That's the same paper I cited and quoted in >>214003349
lmao illiterate indian retard.

>>For Poland, the latent correlations between Raven's progressive matrices, a measure of fluid intelligence, and PISA test scores in Poland were around 0.73 (Pokropek et al., 2021)
this quote shows the opposite of what you want to prove lol. This shows that "fluid intelligence" and pisa scores are highly correlated

>>214011859
>https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04191-y#Sec2
>Other researchers did find evidence of natural selection for SNPs identified by older polygenic scores for educational attainment (EA2) in the 1000G sample , see table 1
Why are you lying? That's not what table 1 covers. It covers height, waist-to-hip ratio adjusted for body mass index and schizophrenia.
The figure just shows that that SNPs associated with these traits have higher mean F_ST than expected by chance.

>>214010213

hence the author's comments
>The finding that PISA achievement scores reflect mostly g, which may arise because PISA aims to test broad abilities in a variety of contexts or may be a general characteristic of LSAs and national achievement tests.
[...]
> This is the first study replicating the PISA’s multidimensional model supplemented by Raven’ ability test scores, measure of fluid intelligence
[...]
>The average correlation of the PISA factors in 2009 and 2010 with the Raven’s factor was the same (r = .73).
[...]
>ECV results for both 2009 and 2010 data indicate that the general factor g explains around 70% of the common variance whereas the remaining part of the common variance is explained by the specific domains. The ECV for g was .73 for both 2009 and 2010.
[...]
>The aim of this study was to assess the degree to which students’ PISA test scores reflect general cognitive ability rather than domain-specific abilities. The analyses presented show that students’ responses to the PISA items reflect mostly g

And somehow you're enough of a low IQ indian to read the paper and come to the conclusion that fluid intelligence is not highly correlated with PISA scores...
...which you claim are a conspiracy to make indians look stupid and low IQ,
... and Lynn and Becker , in addition to the scores of indian researchers whose IQ test results they collected like uppu et al 2015, tooley et al 2010, raven raven and court 1999, jyothi et al 1993, hackett hacket and bhakakta 1998, chowdury and ghosh 2010, ghandhi-kingdon 1996, chiplonkar and kawade 2014, singh and ray 1980, agrawal sinha nad jensen 1984 are also all in the on conspiracy to make indians look stupid and unable to develop and grow their economy like china...
lol

>>214011859
>https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04191-y#Sec2
>Other researchers did find evidence of natural selection for SNPs identified by older polygenic scores for educational attainment (EA2) in the 1000G sample , see table 1
Why are you lying? That's not what table 1 covers. It covers height, waist-to-hip ratio adjusted for body mass index and schizophrenia.
The figure just shows that that SNPs associated with these traits have higher mean F_ST than expected by chance.

>>214012508
>this quote shows the opposite of what you want to prove lol. This shows that "fluid intelligence" and pisa scores are highly correlated
Not really. The paper itself acknowledges that the correlation is low.
>estimates have been low
>the latent correlations between Raven's progressive matrices, a measure of fluid intelligence, and PISA test scores in Poland were around 0.73 (Pokropek et al., 2021).

>>214011900
>There is no correlation between mUh polYGeniC sCores and IQ
lol indians denying correlations of 0.9 between polygenic scores and national IQs just because they can't handle reality >>214003369

> >>214007937.
the paper you link to here doesn't deny that polygenic scores correlate with national IQs, it merely seeks to claim that the SNPs in those poly genic scores don't show signs of natural selection, which is a claim that does not replicate see >>214011859


>>214012546
>Why are you lying? That's not what table 1 covers. It covers height, waist-to-hip ratio adjusted for body mass index and schizophrenia.

Yes it does retard.
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-04191-y#Sec2
go to table 1
see EAY?
What does that stand for?
You should know, you read the paper, right?
So table 1 shows a significant result (p value < 0.05 for the older polygenic score for educational attainment EA2 in the 1000G sample

>>214011859
>cherry picking from thousands of years of history
Thanks for conceding that you've literally contributing nothing in those thousands of years compared to Indians.
>nobel prizes
kek. Is that how you want to do it? India has:
>More Fields Medallists
>More Abel Prize laureates
>More Turing Award laureates
This is despite India lagging 17 years behind China because we opened up out economy 14 years after you.

>>214012586
That's FIGURE 1 not TABLE 1.

Are you ok mr POOJEET ??
are your inbred >>214011910 low IQ genes >>214003369 causing you to fail at simple tasks like finding a table rather than a figure?

>>213998686
bodied these white freaks

>>213998796
it's kimchiwomens fault for being so sexy and rapeable o algo

>>214012898
>>More Fields Medallists
Nope. Both china and india have 2 fields medals
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fields_Medal#List_of_Fields_medalists
>>More Abel Prize laureates
not as prestigious as the fields medal, but yes india has 1, china has 0
>>More Turing Award laureates
No, they both have 1.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turing_Award#Recipients

>This is despite India lagging 17 years behind China because we opened up out economy 14 years after you.
lol and your inferior growth to china has nothing to do with your lower intelligence, right? hahahah

India super power 2030 sar hahahaha

>>213998686
>They are so confident too in their pseudoscience

It's not pseudo science , it's clear scientific evidence
https://scholarlypublishingcollective.org/uip/ajp/article-abstract/134/4/480/291766/Between-Group-Mean-Differences-in-Intelligence-in?redirectedFrom=fulltext (non paywall version https://gwern.net/doc/iq/2021-warne-2.pdf )
https://the-boomer-tribune.medium.com/human-racial-and-ethnic-populations-and-differences-in-iq-scores-3cdd2b5cabe

> The entire idea is that whites are inherently smarter and thus have the right to inherit the world.
That's not the claim being made. The reality is that until white people established the league of nations then the united nations, the norm of every civilization was to invade and conquer and take advantage of any nation that you had the ability to do so. Among the greatest examples of this is the history of Islamic caliphates invading and conquering any surrounding non-muslim country they could.

>Russia was a backwater before the Soviets,
No it wasn't. Russia absolutely bodied the ottoman empire for 300 years before the soviet revolution. Both France and England had to team up against Russia to prop up the ottoman empire and stop them becoming too powerful.
>the Chinese were addicted en masse to opium
And? Prior to European outperformance 600 years ago they were the world economic super power >>214011859 and they have quickly returned to that position

>you are going to backtrack and say they were always destined for greatness because muh IQ?
IQ doesn't claim to explain the entirety of human history, although neither of the points you bring up are actual counter examples.
the fact remains that IQ , or names for the same thing like "cognitive ability" , "cognitive skills", "human capital" are used by economists to successfully predict growth see >>214000597

If IQ didn't mean anything about human cognitive ability then that's quite a coincidence.

IQ denial is motivated reasoning by butthurt browns & nigs

>>214012890
lol Chinkoids insisting that there's a high correlation between mUh polygenic scores and national IQ because that's the only factor which makes those five foot dicklets feel superior to anyone.
https://r.jordan.im/download/racism/bird2021.pdf
>Tests for selection using polygenic scores failed to find evidence of natural selection when the less biased within-family GWAS effect sizes were used. Tests for selection using Fst values did not find evidence of natural selection. Expected mean difference in IQ was substantially smaller than postulated by hereditarians, even under unrealistic assumptions that overestimate genetic contribution
Here's another huge meta-analysis published recently
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0160289624000655
https://www.psypost.org/how-well-can-genetic-scores-predict-iq-heres-what-the-latest-research-reveals/
>the polygenic scores were found to correlate at approximately 0.25 with IQ test results.
>This translates to a difference of ~4 IQ points
And India doesn't even have a proper set of polygenic scores, so I'm not even sure how you're pulling those arguments out of your ching chong ass.

>>213998533 (OP)
Still lower than africa lol

>>214013803
>Prior to European outperformance 600 years ago they were the world economic super power
You KNOW you can't use that argument, ching chong. Because that same pic shows that India was a superpower for far longer than you were. And it only gets worse if we go further into the past (BC), with India having a 50-60% share of global GDP.

>this is /int/ in 2025
why can't you people use your own sites like the chinks do?

kino thread

>>214012038
He won't because it's easier to compete with low IQ timmies like you.

>>213998791
TRVKE

>>213998849
>once india and africa achieves mass literacy and education, they'll have the same average IQ
...no

>>214000465
>I think the aboriginals would have been just as successful.
Stopped reading here.