>>213998533
>citing studies from the 1960s and 1980s
...continuing all the way to the present day
>self-published, non–peer-reviewed
they were peer reviewed, and the national Q samples themselves were often taken from peer reviewed research, and other international IQ scores finding the same results like Lim et al were peer reviewed https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(18)31941-X/fulltext
>"Mankind Quarterly"
The same results were also found independently by the worldwide bank. see pic related https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1831855224044355853/photo/1

Lynn's 2002 national IQ results (which he gathered using IQ test samples that were collected by other psychologists) correlate 0.82 with world bank harmonised learning outcomes data and lynn's 2012 results correlate at 0.88 with the world bank data.