>>24659008
>the proofs are taught "synthetically," i.e., in an organized manner so that what comes successively is shown in relation to what's come prior. The text doesn't say anywhere, "By the way, later props are deduced from earlier ones," that's an assumption readers smuggle in or are mistakenly taught.
Can you elaborate on this or point to where I can learn more? I'm trying to learn about this. So you think Elements doesn't build propositions on previous propositions using deductive logic? Do you think Elements is a good book? I don't know why you don't like chatgpt but I asked it to elaborate on this post and this thread is pretty dead anyway so I'm going to post it in picrel.