>>82267814
no. whichever point of authority you want to claim as binding is just a product of yourself not recognizing its own limits.

say, you have to work a job to stay alive, to buy food, and to be respected. and yet you can still not do it. you can leech, you can starve to death ,you can go live away in the cabins, and the act of following these "rules" isn't any different from not following them. you're not bound by anything than your own rationality, and if you recognize all steps as equal fields in an endless chessboard then suddenly rules vanish. no one dictates to follow a path, or to follow another, but you do. you follow the path you wanted to choose because you decided so. you could eat a nightshade or a strawberry, you eat the strawberry. does nature force you to eat strawberries only? no, you decide so because nightshades would kill you.

but you can die, can't you? why won't you die then?

does fear bind you? regret perhaps? insecurity? aren't all of those made by you? and if so, if you're rulemaker, aren't there no rules?