>>106493178
>I think what anon is saying is that the "we want to protect the kids" thing is a false motivation.
Yes, some politicians don't care about children and are doing these things for many reasons, I stated a few.
>it's just what they use to sell the idea to the public
>Honestly, anon, if you actually believe these justifications at face value, then you are kind of retarded.
Not all politicians have a sinister ulterior motive. I understand disliking authority and government, but it's actually naive to think they never have your interests at heart. Many politicians are simply too stupid to think of the ramifications of their actions, it's why they constantly propose solutions that are technically infeasible/impossible and make no sense. Look at the state of governments around the world, don't you understand how STUPID these people are? Many of them genuinely believe in what they say.
>"Think of the kids" was never once the actual reason behind any of these policies.
I can't state conclusively that you are wrong because I'm ignorant, but it's highly unlikely that you are right. Source: my brain.
