>>17926965
Cope again.

>A good example of racial patrician type is the famous portrait bust of Lucius Junius Brutus, the founder of the Roman Republic, which dates from the fourth century BC, who had brown eyes and an aquiline nose like most Italians

You do not know what "beauty" means, "subflavum" means "dirty blond" or "almost blond", caesaries mean "hairy or dark hair". The sources of Malalas are not reliable since all his work is not trustworthy. Karl Krumbacher, Malalas works as amateurish in both method and composition, assumed to be written for the Byzantine masses JB Bury wrote that Malalas had produced a work with "no sense of proportion" and "many blunders" which was written down to the level of the masses. Only Dinaric and Alpine are found within the cranial composition Italic. There is no "Nordic" phenotype within the composition. Mediterranean phenotypes are found within the Etruscans and the Severian dynasty as Septimus Severus and also in Philip the Arab. In the reconstruction of original color of Augustus of Prima Porta he have Ginger Hair and brown eyes, in the bronze bust he have brown eyes. The bust bronze bust of Hadrian shows brown eyes refuting the Malalas sources. The Romans resemble genetically the modern central italians (excluded Rome) like Tuscany, Lazio, .............. The words used to describes the Germans blondism and light eyes are totally different from those roman sources, knowing that there's a difference beetwen the pigmentation of Nordics and Romans. Plutarch even says Sulla had khrusopon (Latin word for blond, not xanthos) hair that "gave him a singular appearance", that is, that he was different from all other Roman emperors.