>>720731263
About that last part....

Hear me out on my theory, but i personally argue that the knight is actually the vessel itself, the one you make from the start of the game. My arguments and reasons go like this:

>The vessel is a goner (since the character creation screen and body parts are named in the files as Goner_X and stuff). And goners have a connection to gaster
>The knight has pierced hands similar to gaster, and is also very different from any other lightner in the dark world due to him mutating, flying, and doing other weird unusual stuff
>This can be explained due to the nature of the vessel, since it's neither a lightner or darkner (could it possibly have been a flowey situation? being injected with determination or something like that?)
>it can also possibly solve the issue of carrying undyne, since they could very likely maintained their knight form due to them neither being darkner or lightner, but something else.
>your save file still has the data of your vessel saved. Meaning it is not truly discarded and will most likely return one way or another...

My biggest problems for dess knight is the unused dialogue in the code implying she's CURRENTLY lost rather than it being set in the past. The hijacking of spamton to relay a message asking for help also supports. It's also an obvious choice after carol knight due to the antlers and whatnot. And alot of the "evidence" and arguments for dess knight in general just aren't strong and don't convince me. But what do you guys think of the idea of the vessel being the knight?