>>64174643
for a single mag dump? Yes. But since I didn't make a sick webm of it, it never happened. I will report if/when it malfunctions
>>64174707
Imo it feels like if it was unveiled 10 years ago it would have been considered very modern, whereas now it's just reaching par. Dated not as in obsolete but as in mundane. I wouldn't really say... anything good about it at all.. but the Nig Spear represents a "vision" for new tactics and strategy that is probably wrong and retarded, but again, it represents an attempt at something new. So it feels almost mechanically/weaponicistically conservative. Dated as in established. Idk it's like coming out with an improved breed of horse with a new 107 HP engine or some shit while we were still fumbling with what would become the Ford model T. The SIG spear is not that but an attempt as a whole for the industry to find a new paradigm shift that might push the game forward
Also aesthetically it feels exactly the same for all the same reasons. It looks like my PSA upper. Like a Kac upper. Like a BCM upper. The exact same? No. Performance wise? Not even close. But they're all visually coded similarly. It's not innovative, but that's okay! Improving and refining a design, visually, mechanically, and logistically and that's amazing too and will pay dividends. But until someone comes up with something new: m4a1s on mars
