>>24659067
Looks interesting, thanks.
https://libgen.li/ads.php?md5=1ed3fb67cac34480609d924f9dc37c7e
I only read that page so far. It gives you the Greek terms for the parts of each proposition which I posted here:
>>24656225
It also talks about the two different types of propositions which I referred to as constructive and non-constructive. I got that from a youtube video, although they said "non-construction proof". This book talks about problems vs theorems.
Another thing it says which annoys me is that of the words for the six parts of a proposition only the second to last means "proof" in Greek, but the modern sense of "proof" includes four of the six parts. The original Greek way seems more sensible to me, because it's only one part that's an actual deductive argument, which I thought was what a mathematical proof is, but what do I know.
