>>33485875
>No, it's as if it's sought after BY MEN.
yeah, I wonder why. Almost as if most men have basic pattern recognition abilities in regards to female preferences...
Spooky, but luckily that's not true, r-right?
>>33485185
>That's not true.
>And if it is, it's not that bad.
>And if it is, that's not a big deal.
>And if it is, it's not true for all women.
>And if it was, that's not a priority.
>And it was, it's still in your head
For as long as women don't unanimously agree that it matters, they'll have to keep putting up with threads like this and wonder why people keep asking the same questions.

>>33483711
average =/= good, let alone ideal. Average may be average in terms of median, but not in terms of preference. Kinda like 5'9 is the average height, but it's considered to be very short, because the ideal sits somewhere around 6'4.