>>17906863
I speak both logical fact (first premise) and actual fact (second premise).
And as I predicted, you speak only vehemently denial (nuh uh).
I don't blame you though, there really isn't much else you could do anyways, with the burden of opinion and all.

Not that the evidential arguments have ever been defeated which was the point that I wanted to make when I use them like in this instance but I do see why a lot presups don't like it, I don't like it too.
Creates a whole different environment by entertaining or buying into their atheism as even logically plausible.