>>514051826
>You are seeing the Supreme being through eyes of man and claiming "it can't be the Supreme being because it doesn't make sense to my preconceived notions"
you have misunderstood me. I am using pure logic to find an error, but I did not define a supreme absolute. I did not even name it, but you did. I did not claim to know. I said everyone around me knows everything.
>the ancient Greeks and the ancient Hindus were able to conceive of 3 beings into 1 being.
this does not boost my confidence

what about this guy?>>514038947
what did he say?
where is the statue of your prophet?