>>61105212
>The point is that you can't argue in solar and winds favor on the premise that 100% of the potential wind and solar energy can be utilized, because it simply isn't true.
Man this is tedious.

Given the absolutely vast quantities of it available, it doesn't need to be. Nor do solar panels stop working after 20 years. Nor do you need to store it all in batteries when it can be redistribution and put directly into other processes.

I know some of you get all your facts from YouTube blogs and don't know the difference between a joules, watt, amp and volt but muh nuclear generic answer really is a luke warm take.