>>545105273
The latter overrides the former, you're simply a faggot hulking out in combat at points of time before immediately returning to your normal faggotry.
Easily proven by the fact the former NEVER does the latter. See even >>545105567 accidentally proves the point further.
4chan Search
8 results for "064d4ca9717f908eb1ec7c5db4a77302"
>>519157209
>empathy grifter
>reveals he has no empathy for man's best friend
>nobody believes a man can demand empathy for others while abusing dogs
>empathy grift is fucked
A nigger streamer acting like a nigger actually getting his comeuppance? Finally.
>empathy grifter
>reveals he has no empathy for man's best friend
>nobody believes a man can demand empathy for others while abusing dogs
>empathy grift is fucked
A nigger streamer acting like a nigger actually getting his comeuppance? Finally.
>>723095930
>retarded story with the spoiler spooks in the first game
>ignore the second and third games because of it
Interpret these nuts. One fucking job to make the game called Final Fantasy 7 Remake match it's name and they flubbed it.
>retarded story with the spoiler spooks in the first game
>ignore the second and third games because of it
Interpret these nuts. One fucking job to make the game called Final Fantasy 7 Remake match it's name and they flubbed it.
>>722899197
Wow.
Wow.
>>539662185
>go to college
Ah right the place where they endlessly wank themselves off over the validity of objectivity, yeah I'm familiar with it.
If you want to be fucking pedantic over the real nature of objectivity, you'd take into account that absolutely everything is subjective without fail which is why people that aren't retards don't just piss and shit themselves over whether something is objective or subjective, but instead with degrees of objectivity that can reasonably be explain and measured. Then, to keep arguments from going in circles, these measures are shared rather than inferred.
In the case of the tranny menhera poster, the degree of objectivity surrounds a stories quality as the baseline. Thus objective metrics would include "what adds to or takes away from the story" and "what reinforces or weakens the themes" while fair comparison is present to other stories by the same people or stories of similar typing. In this scenario, saying "Wuk ruins the story because I think she's stupid" is subjective, whereas "Wuk's supposed love for her people contradicts greatly with her outsider-level knowledge of them" is in line with the measure of objectivity we're working on and you fail to comprehend. Sit the fuck down, pseud.
>go to college
Ah right the place where they endlessly wank themselves off over the validity of objectivity, yeah I'm familiar with it.
If you want to be fucking pedantic over the real nature of objectivity, you'd take into account that absolutely everything is subjective without fail which is why people that aren't retards don't just piss and shit themselves over whether something is objective or subjective, but instead with degrees of objectivity that can reasonably be explain and measured. Then, to keep arguments from going in circles, these measures are shared rather than inferred.
In the case of the tranny menhera poster, the degree of objectivity surrounds a stories quality as the baseline. Thus objective metrics would include "what adds to or takes away from the story" and "what reinforces or weakens the themes" while fair comparison is present to other stories by the same people or stories of similar typing. In this scenario, saying "Wuk ruins the story because I think she's stupid" is subjective, whereas "Wuk's supposed love for her people contradicts greatly with her outsider-level knowledge of them" is in line with the measure of objectivity we're working on and you fail to comprehend. Sit the fuck down, pseud.
>>714037039
Sorry, I thought maybe a simple comparison for retards would do the trick, but clearly I have several underestimated just how retarded you are.
Sorry, I thought maybe a simple comparison for retards would do the trick, but clearly I have several underestimated just how retarded you are.
>>713254809
Setting the bar this low while constantly digging under it, impressive. The crown of retards is yours. No, please, I insist.
Setting the bar this low while constantly digging under it, impressive. The crown of retards is yours. No, please, I insist.