>>28597595
>>28597612
Annoyingly i don't think it's just to do with mangled or unmangled filesize
I updated the mangler to be slightly less dumb than repeating the original bytes (totally not vibe coded) which gives filesizes approaching but not surpassing the gremlin devs' original 1000 IQ algorithm and it still gives errors even though I've verified the hashes of all unmangled->mangled->unmangled files. There's probably some other limitation I've missed like a maximum number of repeated bytes or something but idk