>>64438796
>I want an actual populist for once that seems to listen to people.

There's a fundamental problem with that, though. Let's look at what the most populist populist in history had to say about it:

>Mein Kampf contains the blueprint of later Nazi propaganda efforts. Assessing his audience, Hitler writes in chapter VI:

>Propaganda must always address itself to the broad masses of the people. (...) All propaganda must be presented in a popular form and must fix its intellectual level so as not to be above the heads of the least intellectual of those to whom it is directed. (...) The art of propaganda consists precisely in being able to awaken the imagination of the public through an appeal to their feelings, in finding the appropriate psychological form that will arrest the attention and appeal to the hearts of the national masses. The broad masses of the people are not made up of diplomats or professors of public jurisprudence nor simply of persons who are able to form reasoned judgment in given cases, but a vacillating crowd of human children who are constantly wavering between one idea and another. (...) The great majority of a nation is so feminine in its character and outlook that its thought and conduct are ruled by sentiment rather than by sober reasoning. This sentiment, however, is not complex, but simple and consistent. It is not highly differentiated, but has only the negative and positive notions of love and hatred, right and wrong, truth and falsehood.[5]

A populist rules by reducing the population to its dumbest, least critical state and then appealing to that stupidity. The populist leader is then largely limited to doing stupid things. When the People say, "2 plus 2 equals 3 and we need to hurt (((them))) for trying to indoctrinate our CHILDREN that it's four" the populist leader can never, ever, ever, ever, ever say, "But it is four."