>>718482545
No it does, you can't read, you are not as intelligent as you try to appear. "We're bringing real Beauty" is outright in the title, they want to redefine what is beauty, as in, not beautiful, as in

>Together with our partners – Epic Games’ Unreal Engine and Women in Games, we’ll work to train game creators, developers and artistsall around the world to create a broader representation of women in gaming and to help reflect the diversity we see in everyday life.

As in, you can't make beautiful women in games anymore.

The best example is Sid Meiers Pirates! 2004 remake, in that games there are 3 types of governor's daughter you can marry, "plain", "attractive" and "beautiful", now that is a "broad representation of women" but you know, I know, everybody knows, you know too but you'll try to deny that if this game was remade today, this would not fly according to Dove's now enforced guidelines on Epic developers. Because it implies that the "Beautiful" governor's daughter is better looking than the "Plain" one and even the "Attractive" one, and the "Beautiful" has big tits and is conventionally attractive to the average man. If Dove was there, they would order the design team to rework this or remove it altogether and point to their public, open guidelines if questioned. It literally means that women should never be conventionally attractive, as the recent games proved, not about a range of representation, precisely the reverse of what you said. You are so midwit, this was extremely easy to prove.

You sir are a liar and a scumbag.