Thread 718462473

The idea that a game can be ruined because its female lead isn't "attractive," or because it has 5 minutes of diversity/inclusivity is so incredibly juvenile and needs to no longer be taken seriously.

>>718462473 (OP)
too bad, increasing numbers of people are getting sick of totalitarians psychos and their power hungry pathologies

>>718462473 (OP)
>one spoon of shit doesn't affect the barrel of honey
Sure

>>718462815
/thread

>>718462473 (OP)

>The idea that a game can be ruined because its female lead isn't "attractive," or because it has 5 minutes of diversity/inclusivity is so incredibly juvenile and needs to no longer be taken seriously.

Tell that to the shareholders when the company loses another $100 million because you didn't want to give the characters big tits.

>>718462473 (OP)
>i-it's just 5 minutes of diversity dogshit, no biggie
it's still shit tho and ruins the game, so what's the fucking point here?
>>718462815
this

>>718462473 (OP)
I don't take your kind seriously either. I mean, your entire personality is getting mad at tits.

It will ruin the perception of that game. I don't care about woke or anti-woke at all. I will play your game if it's good.But the plebs will not as they will hear what the loud retards have to say.
If the marketing focuses on thing that make the game seem woke, you will hear about it and it might even signal about problems with a game. Plebs want to buy a game and not get preached at.

>>718462473 (OP)
Except this shit doesn’t exist in a vacuum. It’s there because someone in development wanted it there and that someone clearly has influence. If someone like that is in the company, the idea that they’ll restrain themselves to only influencing that decision is laughable. Since that’s the case, it’s an immediate red flag, same as any other questionable decision relating to gameplay, story or programming.
The best case scenario is that’s because they were coerced into including it and it doesn’t impact the rest of the game, but since I’m not psychic I can’t exactly bank on this.

>>718462473 (OP)
>uggo/nog/troon
I will not buy.
Simple as.

>>718462473 (OP)
Op is a faggot and should go back

>unironic replies ITT
Please just nuke this fucking board already literal bots are more intelligent than nu/v/ faggots

>>718462473 (OP)
imagine having this mindset...
>[Game] is misogynistic! [Game] needs more strong female leads (to replace male leads, which i don't like, because i hate men)!
>[Game] is racist (and has too many white people)! [Game] needs more diversity (i am so so so sorry black people how can you ever forgive me?)!
>[Game] is homo/trans/whatever -phobic! [Game] needs to be more inclusive (towards sexual deviancy and exploitable mental illness)!

to then find out the vast majority of game enjoyers don't actually enjoy games which have any amount of pandering to the aforementioned minorities- not even the minorities they supposedly fight for- only to then gaslight everyone that their reaction to what was essentially a failed coup is now an overraction and not a big deal...

Lol, making good games is HARD, even when you have time, talent, money, passion and FOCUS is still HARD to make a good game.

So, how the hell you can make a good game at the price of focus, time wasted, and talent quitting/getting demoralized due to "politics"?

So yeah, woke games will always be worse.

>>718462473 (OP)
a red flag isn't a problem, it's a sign indicating there is a problem

>>718462473 (OP)
don't care, not playing woke shit

>>718462473 (OP)
>start a war
>begin to lose the war
>"w-wait w-wait! no it doesnt matter!"
>"s-stop caring about this!"
no, you will die on the hill you created.

>>718462473 (OP)
You need a very solid premise to have an ugly lead.
In games like Disco Elysium it's more than justified.
What they are trying to do is shove ugly females for generic normalfag slop and fail to see how jarring that is.
Imagine if Nathan Drake was chinless wimp with exaggerated overbite or a chubby neckbeard.

>>718462473 (OP)
then I shan't take consider buying your slop seriously :^)

>>718462473 (OP)
except that's literally stopped me from buying so many games

anti-woke fatigue made me start liking woke games

>>718462473 (OP)
Way to twist an argument. These people are always twisting words to make even the most sane and logical thing sound evil and horrifying.

They just can't get over the fact that sex sells and people aren't interested in disgusting monsters like them.

>>718462473 (OP)
>5 minutes of diversity/inclusivity
it doesn't matter if it has 1 minute of that DEI dogshit. your game will flop because nobody wants that fucking trash

I'd pay real money to watch Kim belair get beheaded on live television

>>718463712
I agree with the sentiment, but a flaw of your idea is that if you do nothing, eventually, nothing will be for you, it will all be for blacks, gays and wokes.

Doing nothing lets them win.

>>718462473 (OP)
>Erm, chudigga, everything is political! How's pac-man political? Well the japanese thought it would appeal to women too because they thought women liked to eat. See, every choice has politics embedded in it.
>AIEEEEEEEEE STOP POINTING OUT THE POLTICIAL REASONS WE MADE THE MC AN UGLY NIGGER THAT ISN'T POLITICIS!!!!

bump

>>718462473 (OP)
>internet "hot take"
>same take as most retards, only a bit of opposition
are these niggas real
they want to be an edgy minority so bad kek

>>718462473 (OP)
Still not buying, sorry.

Having characters that are intentionally ugly and ot has forced unnecessary woke shit is a good metric for deciding if a game is going to be shit.
Not directly because of the inclusion but because what the inclusion means. How many different meetings was done to sign off on it, whoever pushed it and so on. If it doesn't come across as a natural evolution of making the game objectively better, it means that game development was spent doing something bad which will 100% bleed over to different areas of development.

It's like constantly being late by a few minutes. On it's own it's not the worst thing to do but there is underlying qualities a person possesses to have that be a constant that aren't positives. We've had this shit happen so much that we've been able to use pattern recognition, basic human instincts, to see something wrong.

These same people complain about minor details or characters that problematic or sexist or whatever. Is a game ruined because the protagonist is a scantily clad woman? Many of these people would say yes.

>>718462473 (OP)
>just eat a little bit of shit, it doesn't matter
how about no

>>718462473 (OP)
I still won't buy

>>718462473 (OP)
No refunds on that chopped off dick
>>718462815
/thread

trvth nvke

>>718462473 (OP)
>5 minutes of diversity/inclusivity
Is this tweet from 2010?
>protagonists should be unattractive
Who would buy a repulsive game?

>>718462473 (OP)
That's fine. Still won't buy that doesn't have those things.

>>718462473 (OP)
reposting twitter shit is not videogames.

>>718462473 (OP)
>"attractive"
roastie claws

>>718464880
There's so many good old games out there that I couldn't possibly play all of them until my death anyway.

>>718462473 (OP)
The issue has always been their use of established IPs in which to insert this shit. Nobody cares if you want to make a Dustborn or that pronoun hero shooter that lost Sony hundreds of millions of dollars. They stood on their own merits and failed spectacularly. Fine, make a better game. Nobody cares about tranny bait games like Celeste, Stardew Valley and Undertale/Deltarune. They were massive successes in their own right, and I don’t have to play it if I don’t want to.

Then you have franchises like Dragon Age, Mass Effect and Assassin’s Creed that will likely not see another entry in the foreseeable future because these hacks constantly feel the urge to insert their California bullshit into places where they don’t belong.

>>718462473 (OP)
Retinal woulda sold 3 times as much if the mc was hot.
It's just the truth

Game companies are free to make whatever they fucking want. Just don't bitch at people like me for not buying your game while your business goes bankrupt.

>>718462473 (OP)
>twitter repost

>>718464880
>eventually, nothing will be for you
There is already enough material for a lifetime.

>>718462473 (OP)
Well, the data says otherwise

>>718462815
Thread over. One drop rule, always.

>>718462473 (OP)
The idea that a game can be ruined because its female lead is "attractive," or because it has 5 minutes of being based is so incredibly juvenile and needs to no longer be taken seriously.

>>718462815
cope

>>718464880
>will all be for blacks, gays and wokes.
Watching the industry collapse because they solely pander to those people while production costs skyrocket would have been absolutely hilarious though.

>>718464392
list 5 you boughted and finished liar-kun

>>718468028
>t. canada

If you're going to make an ugly woman character you should just make it a man instead.

>>718462473 (OP)
screencap of a retweet of a tweet to make a thread
It's so tiresome.

>>718468219
but if i get a thread with many replies what's the issue?

>>718462815
So one bad level in a game means the entire experience is bad?

>>718467993
Stardew Factory is woke, I guess, but it's pretty fun.

>>718462815
why is it always literal shit and food analogies with /v/?
>captcha: SNP00

>>718462473 (OP)
Hilarious these "people" now think their balls are by the fire that they have the revolutionary positions of being anti anti-woke. You lost, trannies.

>>718468506
Shit isn't food anon

>>718468506
What analogy would suit your limited taste pallet then?
Adding a handful of sugar in gas tank?

>>718468672
i never said i disliked them i was just seeing if anyone else shared my shit eating fetish.

>>718462473 (OP)
>Can't win awards unless you have enough black people in your movie

>>718468901
post that picture a million more times

>>718468954
Fair enough.

>>718462473 (OP)
Ok, i'll put some nazi flags and a few ss officers into my fantasy rpg where they don't belong and you best not kvetch about it if that's the way you feel.

>>718468346
A bad enough level can cause people to drop the whole game.
Sometimes I think about replaying a game, remember a bad part about it and change my mind.

>>718462473 (OP)
>5 minutes
Hilarious from the "X is not enough" crowd.

If you want to make a ugly female character at least make her ugly but cool

Why do faggots makes these posts? Why copy verbatim what the tweet says when i can fucking read the tweet? Why is OP such a faggot?

>>718469162
>the veil

I don't care if a female character is ugly, but when it's systematic to uglify female characters then yeah I mind.

Why don't they just make the female character beautiful

>>718469457
why dont they just add porn to the game?

>>718462473 (OP)
>The idea that a game can be ruined because its female lead isn't "attractive," or because it has 5 minutes of diversity/inclusivity is so incredibly juvenile and needs to no longer be taken seriously.
But that's retarded. If I spot a bit of mold on a loaf of bread I don't assume there's no more of it, I write the whole thing off. Why the fuck would I buy something when I can see the creator went out of his way to shit it up?

>>718462473 (OP)
>no longer
as if I ever took that seriously. People here used to complain about SJWs getting hyper fixated on aspects of a game that had nothing to do with gameplay. Now trailer screenshots measuring jawline angles and forhead heights are the centerpiece of discussion about upcoming games if there's a woman in it. It'd be funny if it weren't so sad.

>>718462815
You mean 300 spoons of shit, dei garbage inclusion in video games is everywhere

>>718462473 (OP)
>can be ruined because its female lead isn't "attractive,"
meanwhile journos when a female lead is not ugly enough:

>>718468954
Once you refute it it'll stop being posted

>>718468506
Because DougDoug.

>>718470297
cry

>>718462473 (OP)
Ugly women as main characters are what twitteroids would call a "red flag." It's not necessarily what ruins the game, but it's a strong indicator that it isn't going to be worth your time.

>>718465893
Never thought I'd play a game which made me angrier than mass effect 3.

>>718462473 (OP)
The idea that a game needs to be bought/supported/defended because its female lead isn't "attractive," or because it has 5 minutes of diversity/inclusivity is so incredibly juvenile and needs to no longer be taken seriously.

>>718462778
>increasing numbers of people are getting sick of totalitarians psychos and their power hungry pathologies
And yet they won the popular vote

>>718462473 (OP)
>agree with me or I won't take you seriously
I literally do not care

>>718470297
>sexier for more people
Go make a game with sexy disabled people then

>>718470380
Why do you hate beautiful women? Is it because you'll never be one?

>>718470430
I'll have to say it: This guy passes. He is literally indistinguishable from a 2/10 fat woman

>>718470430
>Searching for posts with the image hash ‘DVjghrC4it1bfp5dtoeM+g==’. 238 results found.
holy mentally ill seethe

Indias hatred of anything female is weird af.

>>718470441
No one ever subscribed to that idea in the first place, that was always pure projection on your part

>>718462473 (OP)
Wrong.
People dont mind DEI as long as it makes at least abit of sense or you know, these characters are actually well written and are not either some sjw's obvious self insert or tokens that shout only DEI catchphrases.

Like for example transition scars in fantasy games, especially in ones that magic can solve almost every problem with magic including perfectly changing your appearance including your biological sex. Why the hell some guy who wanted to be a girl wanted to go through "Medical procedures" of multilating genitalia and wearing wigs and shit only to end up looking like some abomination with "frankenpussy", when he can go to the wizard and he will turn him into fully functional real girl.
Same with wheelchairs in DnD, why the hell someone would use wheelchair when basically even peasant can just go to any priest of the good god and get his wounds healed, his limbs recovered and his diseases removed for free.

Or characters that their only trait is "Being nonbinary" and talks all time about being non-binary everytime it opens mouth.
Or half of the game is lecturing people playing some game about how misgendering is wrong.

>>718462473 (OP)
>only 5 minutes of DEI
>when companies are threatened by companies like sweet baby, have forced discord sessions with queer/blacks/"experts" in LBFGTQ+++ trannies, forced inclusion, sexy females are verboten, Blackrock spending billions to "force cultural change, GTA "won't punch down"
All this propaganda stuff runs deep, all of this also doesn't include all the people with NO talent whatsoever, all the nepobabies with connections and woke people

>>718470441
I bought the horizon games cuz fighting giant robot animals was fun for me, not to support the poor ugly protagonist with her slender form and six pack abs. The things I've seen called ugly here by people who won't post their face is absurd, but also irrelevant to the gameplay.

>>718470758
>People dont mind DEI as long as it makes at least abit of sense
Yes they do

>>718470830
Aloy isn't even ugly (although the actress is too old to convincingly portray a nineteen-year-old)

>>718470668
That is exactly what happens. Did you completely forget ESG scores? It was all forced just for games to get approval

>>718470834
I didn't mind Lune being asian in e33, it was fine.

>>718470835
>In my head you are as silly as I am therefore

>>718470919
Yes she is.

>>718470921
"ESG scores" never really meant what you people thought they did anyway, and we're also not even talking about that
>>718470923
Oh, you didn't mind this one instance, well I guess that means everyone on /v/ is just completely reasonable about minorities in video games all the time

>>718464880
>it will all be for blacks, gays and wokes
the people who don't buy videogames?

>>718471004
Of course everyone on /v is never going to be reasonable. There's plenty of retards who are anti woke as well, that's just how it is with pretty much any position, you'll share it with plenty of absolute retards who take it too far.

>>718470919
Most actors playing high schoolers are, as are most 3 month infants playing newborns, but that's irrelevant to the gameplay. Go to the next thread about aloy and watch people robotically recite their lines about her being ugly/fat and posting the edited trailer screenshot. It's hilarious to behold.

>>718471095
So why say "people don't mind" when you are in the place where people obviously do mind, all the time?

>>718471113
What I mean is, Hannah Hoekstra is a beautiful woman in her 30s but she's not 19 any more like the game would have us believe, which might affect how people assess her beauty. I agree it's not relevant to anything.

>>718471152
I wasn't the first poster, but you could say most people don't mind. Even among anti woke people most people won't mind it if it's done well like in E33.

>>718462473 (OP)
Would you accept that a sportsgame is interrupted to shove propaganda down your throat? Imagine you bought a ball and rented a field to play soccer, football or whatever with your buddies, and some rabid troon runs onto the field with its entourage of yes-men, takes your ball and forces you to watch and listen to his bullshit before you're allowed playing again.
Would you continue renting the place if the owner allowed, encouraged or even helped facilitate this? Would you continue buying this brand of balls, if you learned that it attracts troons and their yes-men?

Would you pay for propaganda and to be bothered by failed eugenics/(para)social experiments?

>design a character with the sole purpose of being an unattractive woman or certain ethnicity
>their entire personality is centered about being an unattractive woman or said ethnicity
>start to cry about misogyny and racism when we don’t like these characters

They don’t seem to get it do they? For a group that keep preaching for equality they’re the ones that have the most rules and limited perspective.

>>718471530
>Would you pay for propaganda and to be bothered by failed eugenics/(para)social experiments?
No, I get that here for free

>>718471657
Name one (1) character

>>718462473 (OP)
It's called a red flag.

>>718471727
You, the player.

>>718462473 (OP)
except it isn't 5 minutes. They make a shit story with their shit writing and message at the fundamental core and we can't sleep fast enough

>>718470758
Which game is it that spends half its length lecturing you about misgendering? I need a name and perhaps a YouTube video of the cutscenes so I can accurately measure?

I don't really care much about women in the game, or diversity, per se.

What's more important is HOW they choose to implement them. As it typically is, they're used as the marketing of the game over the gameplay, i.e. the focus is on the "inclusivity" to overlook the game. Even invoking the word just screams that energy is being put in the wrong place.

>>718471657
>They don’t seem to get it do they?
They get it, they know. But the goal is to make something that will make any straight white man nauseous, everything else is irrelevant.

>>718462473 (OP)
You still can't force us to buy it, chud. Keep seething.

>>718462473 (OP)
The most interesting part of this is that their ideals only work when the resource is limited, when people have too much choice, too many video games, then people can finally say "no" to the very small aspects that they don't prefer.
Because that's what it really is for most people, just preference. This tard is framing it as "incredibly juvenile" but since when is "preference" juvenile? Someone will just prefer the same game but with attractive women in it and you can't force them to change their mind.
Maybe it's juvenile to expect people's preferences to align with your own.

>>718468506
Everyone eats and shits.

>>718471889
Name one game that used the words "diversity" or "inclusivity" in its marketing

>>718472102
Keep at it, if you reply often and quick enough people might think there's not just one seething tranny shitting up the thread
You lost btw.

stop fighting, why can't we be friends instead? #blm #pride #abortwhitebabies

>>718472229
I'm just asking a question bruv

>>718466983
>land whale blue lipstick
>Cover your shooter protag with intestine patterns
>paint them with the most repulsive color in existence
>Why won't you play our game?

>>718472408
Written by a white Norwegian dude btw

>>718462473 (OP)
I’m not giving money to your tranny propaganda. Die angry about it

>>718464392
>anti woke fatigue

You’ve been spamming this in multiple threads across multiple boards and websites. It’s clearly you doing it too. At what point do you accept your forced meme isn’t catching on

>>718472229
>>718472446
All right, I guess you're intimidated by one seething tranny even when you've got numbers on your side

>>718462473 (OP)
I think you need a very strong reason for the lead to night be in some way attractive. Even Dave the Diver, a fat fuck, has a sort of earnest charm to him. The protagonist of all three Dark Souls games may look like a piece of beef jerky, but they can cover it up in trim armor. Even Concord, which seemed allergic to attractive-looking characters, put the passable Lennox, the lizard guy, front and center in the advertising

>>718462473 (OP)
I'm just glad people like that aren't taken seriously.

>>718473118
You didn't ask me a question, i just noticed your seething and pointed it out is all.
My only other post is this.
>>718469105

>>718462473 (OP)
Listen, if you have a ugly sheboon as the lead character i am just not gonna buy your game no matter how good it is. If you have to have women in the game, make them hot.

>>718468506
/v/ isn't capable of arguing a point directly, they can only argue over far removed analogies instead

>>718462815
Several bands of maggots make an entire new cheese

>>718462815
OP btfo

>>718462473 (OP)
>it no longer needs to be taken seriously
>NOOO WHY DID THE GAME BOMB?

>>718464880
Well no because they aren't a large enough audience to sustain most of this shit, but also their time is split between shooting eachother and 40oz, we have roughly a whole decade of that specific strategy failing spectacularly.

>>718471872
Haven't you heard about doing pushups for misgendering someone in dragon age veilguard?
https://youtu.be/j1WD-8umF4w?feature=shared

ok then you won't get my juvenile money, fuck off

>>718462473 (OP)
I will not tolerate propaganda under any circumstance. I will react violently and uncontrollably because of you and you will have to deal with it.

>>718462473 (OP)
A purposefully made unattractive female is a symptom rather than a disease. It is a sign that developmental time and design choices were influenced by people who didn't have fun as their primary goal but rather "inclusivity".
Hence the game will more than likely be crap because the people making the game have irrelevant things at a higher priority.

>>718474207
Well yes but I thought the game was longer than 2 minutes, per the post I was replying to indicating it took up half a game. I think it took them longer to write that post than the cutscene they're referring to if we're talking about that.

>>718474476
They come back to that topic from time to time.

>>718462815
/thread

>>718474535
Yeah but condensed down it's only a few minutes and you aren't sitting there listening to a lecture for half the game which is what you implied.
Get fact checked, chud.

>>718474724
>Talk about some important topic.
>Someone accidentally says someone's real pronouns instead of his/her made up pronouns. FUCK EVERYTHING YOU GOTTA DO PUSH UPS NOW.

>>718474724
This isn't me but the main thrust of his point is consistent with mine. I was just illuminating the follies of hyperbole.

>>718462473 (OP)
Thats just your - irrevelant and unpopular - opinion. Darkie, fag or a girlboss=no buy.

>>718474880
>I was just illuminating the follies of hyperbole.
True, people always be critiquing my smoke alarm and shit but if you think about it it's only a minute or two every year.

>>718470380
>cry

>>718462473 (OP)
The mentioned two things waste development time.
You ACTIVELY have to try and make someone as ugly as current year westoids do since there is a mountain of examples that exists already that can act as a guideline on how to not be ugly. "5 minutes of diversity" takes weeks to months of dev time thanks to constant HR back-and-forths with all teams involved so as to not offend anybody(except those heckin chuds). Uggos and diversity always existed in games, it was just at a tolerable level or factually negligible back then. You faggots just want the whole fucking mile when you were given a single inch in good faith.

>>718462815
One drop rule reings supreme

>>718462473 (OP)
worked out well for dragon age. hows bioware doing after being gutted?

>>718462473 (OP)
I will never understand why the far left hates beauty.

>>718462778
but enough about trump

>>718473532
>You didn't ask me a question
All right then, *can* you name one game etc.?
And before the inevitable cheeky "yes" with no follow-up, would you please proceed to name it?

>>718464880
Doing nothing has been btfoing them hard. They NEED sales. Wokies that actually buy games are few and far between. They either make games for us or for none, because nobody else is interested in the first place.

>>718468506
>the mold in the corner of my house/apartment won't affect me
there you go retard

>>718475258
What imaginative twaddle

>>718462473 (OP)
correct
an ugly character does not make a good game bad
just like an attractive character does not make a bad game good
Chell is objectively below average and the portal games are great

>>718475110
Wait, do you have the vanguard misgendered scene programmed to play on all your house's screens a few times a year? Why would you do that? It's not required by building codes like smoke alarms.

>>718468954
We'll stop when you refute it one(1) single time.

>>718469162
Dropping a great game because of one bad level is an indicator of either low iq or skill issue.

>>718462473 (OP)
>needs to no longer be taken seriously
You could just ignore it, the fact you have to keep telling yourself that while fighting back the tears means the push is working.

>>718475649
As imaginative as your choice of pronouns

>>718475860
NTA but people shouldn't be looked down on for not wanting to force themselves through something unenjoyable
it's the dev's responsibility to ensure the player enjoys the game, as that's the entire purpose

>>718464880
mass produced slop will always be mass produced slop, it does not stop being slop because they remove niggers and trannies. if ac shadow had a chad nip samurai and no enby shit it would still be a boring open world checklist with intrusive microtransactions and paid "time savers".
no matter what some nerd in a basement will eventually make a game i want to play and failing that i have decades of old games to play

trannies/sexy girls are the bait for culture warring retards to get mad at while ignoring the real rot beneath

>>718462473 (OP)
>The idea that a game can be ruined because its female lead isn't "attractive," or because it has 5 minutes of diversity/inclusivity is so incredibly juvenile and needs to no longer be taken seriously.
Why would I as a guy want to read a feminist empowerment story. I already can't relate to the lead and if they are ugly then it isn't visually appealing either.
Same goes for some diverse person struggling with evil privileged white people.
The game offers me nothing but lectures, propaganda, and demands to vote for various things, I can just watch the "news" for that.

>>718475963
What, he/him? Didn't really think about it, actually

>>718462815
SPBP

>>718470758
>Like for example transition scars in fantasy games
That shit was eye-opening to me. Those degenerates don't actually want to be the other sex, they want to be trans. Not male, not female, but trans.

>>718462473 (OP)
Holy fuck you woke faggots need to be dragged out kicking and screaming. You alternate between justifying every retarded shitskin or faggot or uggo and then mocking players for "never getting back what we took from you" like a small child on the playground. I never cared about culture war shit but you are so fucking obnoxious I hate you faggots on sight. Kill yourselves you fucking parasites.
>>718467325
This anon gets it. The leddit quippy shitskin campus people DO NOT understand why no one wants their shit anymore. But no, lets all see the obese black girlboss take charge again. And again. And again.

>>718462815
true
>>718462473 (OP)
any dev which purposefully makes an unappealing main character shows a lack of taste which will be reflected in the rest of the game. If there is no good faith effort to make a character appealing there will be no good faith effort to make the game fun either

>>718476478
They are narcisistic degenerates. They want to be special - and its preciesly because they arent, they are just low value.

>>718476478
I mean if a real trans person with those scars puts them on their character they're in the same camp as the "I don't play as a girl cuz I'm not a girl" people. If self insert is valid at all it's universally valid.

>>718462473 (OP)
Who cares about her opinion. She doesn't get to decide the game's Steam player count LMAO
>UR JUVENILE YOU NEED TO ACCEPT HOMOS I'M NOT TAKEN YOU SERIOUSLY
Keep insulting the potential players, I'm not buying nor pirating your game, your move.

>>718470830
>The things I've seen called ugly here by people who won't post their face is absurd
Why would people's willingness to dox themselves make these characters less ugly?

>>718476496
Literally all they said was that having a black person in the game doesn't ruin it and this is how you respond
Who's the obnoxious preschooler here exactly

>>718462473 (OP)
I will continue to not buy your games and there is nothing you can do about it.

I only play chinese games

>>718477104
Funny to depict the chud as a Buddhist monk when in reality this board is 24/7 pure seething

>>718477053
>its just having a black person, totally
Or he just doesn't takes your blatant dishonesty at face value. You not liking this does not make him immature.

>>718470086
>People here used to complain about SJWs getting hyper fixated on aspects of a game
This "it's just like what the SJWs did" shit is so dishonest. SJWs used political pressure and discriminatory hiring practices to force games to change into something the majority of customers didn't like.
People who are complaining about those things are customers who use the power of "not buying your lame and gay game" to make those games flop. Those things are not the same.

>>718470668
Ok, so what's the point of these endless ugly characters and forced diversity then? Who is it for?

>>718462473 (OP)
>5 minutes of diversity/inclusivity
Personally I think that's one is fair. If the rest is fine it can be ignored, no need to look for fag dialogue options to get offended about if you so t want it. Problem is that it's rarely just 5 minutes and the viral clip is more the most overt example of how the whole thing is written with woke undercurrent.
>female lead isn't "attractive"
Why would I play a game with ugly female lead? Like, that's a genuine question, if I'm going to see her for dozens or hundreds of hours she should be pleasant to the eyes. Of there's a good narrative reason than maybe, but I might not be into a game that explores life of an ugly girl or something either.

>>718477019
Well I personally don't believe in imposing standards on other people that I can't or won't myself adhere to. And honestly the standards I impose on myself are exclusively for me, while we're at it.

>>718462473 (OP)
Imagine how people would react if a game intentionally made the male lead look like a loser, like oh hey here's the new uncharted, but pic related is the MC now. The people in charge of the IP would shut that down so fast it's not even funny, so you have to ask yourself why they let that sort of thing fly for the female lead.

>>718462473 (OP)
>take well established IP
>turn all the characters into gay, tranny, niggers
>hurrr this shouldn't bother you

>>718477447
can I have a 5 minute scene where I rape middle schooler girls? no? okay, then you can't have 5 minutes of tranny shit, end of story

>>718470802
It's true that beneath all this, if you remove all DEI / ESG / RSI / LGBT stuff the product beneath this is bland and bad. I bet the the investors thought it was a great way to churn out garbage as long as they have the MK_ULTRA trigger in the product to subliminally instruct the customer that he has to like the product. Instead people developed a disdain for it, even better, some people outright "woke" up from the MK_ULTRA programming and are outright newly in favor of outlawing homosexuality for example to the chagrin of activist investors like Marc Benioff.

>>718462815
>>one spoon of shit doesn't affect the barrel of honey
its more like
>one spoon of shit doesn't affect the barrel of shit

>>718477482
I_made_this.jpg

>>718477337
It literally is just that, though
I also don't have to take all your dishonest excuses at face value

>>718477456
But vidya characters aren't real people.

>>718477362
For everyone :^)
And the developers in the first place

>>718475553
>*can* you name one game etc.?
Battletoads
No, i can't think of a single one where those words are on the poster if that satisfies you, you don't think the marketing execs behind Concord or Hyenas were throwing around those words behind closed doors though?
I'll speak to Hyenas as i play total war which is the only reason i care about such a game but i've watched videos where insiders leaked the game was going to have a vastly different, gritty aesthetic at one point and then it was changed by the upper execs to appeal to their hypothetical diversity and equity loving market.

>>718477640
Seems irrelevant in the ghost of yotei threads

>>718462473 (OP)
>watch trailer to newest triple A slop
>"diversity this, inclusion that"
>Turn off the trailer
>don't buy the game
Simple as.

>>718477447
>Why would I play a game with ugly female lead? Like, that's a genuine question, if I'm going to see her for dozens or hundreds of hours she should be pleasant to the eyes.
So do you ONLY play games where the lead is an attractive women in third person? So that excludes all male characters and non-human characters. And why stop there: what if the environments or enemies are ugly? I guess you can't play any horror games either. I mean, you're going to be looking at this and it should be pleasant to the eyes.
You have the same criterion for movies?

>>718477725
And? What a non-sequitur.

>>718477325
Our seething might look like calm meditation compared to the people freaking out because their games are flopping hard and being made fun of their low player count. As a matter of fact, the best way to make them freak out even more is to not display any emotion, to show them that they are powerless even at making responses.

>>718477703
>behind closed doors
Okay, so they're not used in the marketing over the gameplay

>>718477943
>And why stop there: what if the environments or enemies are ugly?
NTA, but yes.

Nice twatter thread but let's check out how cool page 10 is

>>718477973
Just the most recent example of people centering game discussion around the appearance of someone involved in the game. They do the same thing to writers as if that proves anything.

>>718475860
>you must play through shitty garbage or else you're low IQ
shalom

I just don't like ugly people. If I want the experience you're trying to sell, I'll just go watch elephant man.

>>718478003
>Our seething might look like calm meditation compared to the people freaking out because their games are flopping hard and being made fun of their low player count.
Believe me, it doesn't.
>the best way to make them freak out even more is to not display any emotion
You fail at that.

>>718462473 (OP)
Literally nobody has ever said that but leftists can't understand basic logic and they're constantly arguing with strawmen.

>>718478238
Oh, well, they haven't literally said it, I guess that completely changes matters
>Meanwhile, also /v/ >>718470441

>>718478057
I already answered that. Don't mind this non-sequitur image which has no words on it and is therefore not pertinent to this discussion.

>>718462473 (OP)
Lets see how many games or movies chicks like would not be ruined if the mail lead was not attractive.

>>718468506
One spoon of tar in a bucket of honey.
Here.
Won't your precious feelings be offended by that one?

>>718471530
so every superbowl since 2015? Yeah their ratings tanked for it too. Imagine having a class of people so domesticated they watch a show to see the ads, and you still fuck it up.

>>718478384
>I already answered that.
Not really
You said it's bad when the marketing focuses on diversity and inclusiveness over gameplay, but what you're really telling me is that it's a vibe you get and you just assume it's what the marketers were talking about as opposed to your own obsession with these things making you jump to conclusions. You're the one putting weight on these things, not they.

>>718478162
Yes it does.
I'm still not buying or pirating your DEI games.

>>718478097
>discussion around the appearance of someone involved in the game
>involved
Well it blurs the line when she is also IN the game. The devs picked her, and the devs modeled her, so it's not beyond critique. Imo in a perfect world devs would just make bespoke character models for their characters instead of relying on face scan cancer. But we don't live in a perfect world.

>>718462473 (OP)
>5 minutes of diversity
Considering the most "diverse" media those fags like is media with the only diversity being diverse shades of nigger, the bastard is lying through their teeth.
If it was really "five minutes" nobody would bitch about it besides some pearl clutching kulturkampf fags. After all, annoying characters existed since forever and people rolled their eyes, thought "what a faggot/bitch/twerp" and moved on.

>>718478593
Football is gay.

Okay, it sounds reasonable on paper so lets examine that claim a bit closer. A few years back people tried to boycot a harry potter game because the author of the original works made political statements. So clearly both sides agree that the politics of the creator can negatively impact your enjoyment. Lets also try to steelman the argument and see if you would agree. What if instead of things the right hates it would be a 5 minute monologue about how hitler was good actually in the middle of a game that has virtually nothing to do with real life politics, would that negatively impact your overall enjoyment of the game? Well, I don't have to ask, because phrases like "nazi coded" are thrown about constantly as the reason why people steer away from movies and TV shows.

Enjoyment is an emotional state, your emotions are not only impacted by a piece of media. The easiest example to understand is if your own child draws you something. The drawing is probably dogshit, but the enjoyment it brings to you as a parent trumps the artistic value of the piece. The chance that you like a picture drawn by your child over some $20 framed illustration that is commercially sold is pretty high.

We can also observe some games like baldurs gate, where the woke aspect is strong, but it is not the only dominant force in the game. It's undeniable that you can play the game in a fashion that will make right wingers seethe, but the game also allows you to play your right wing wet dream if you want. Now compare baldurs gate to dragon age the veilguard. In veilguard you can ONLY play as the woke brainchild of the developers, it lacks ideological diversity. And that is the problem. Most games with woke content are created by woke people who despise people with ideas to the right of them, that's why the people they despise don't find enjoyment in their games and that's why they see ideological indicators as a warning signal that they will not enjoy those games.

>>718477362
Jews, Blackrock to be specific

>>718468506
>>718473582
It's a good analogy actually.

>>718462473 (OP)
This is accidentally correct - if the game was actually good being filled with 12 trillion lesbian niggers wouldn't change the fact that it was good. Unfortunately it's essentially arguing against your intended bait

>>718476009
>>718478102
>according to /v/ one bad hour out of a 90 hour masterpiece means the game is now a 0/10

>>718462473 (OP)
Western devs just make a game with a princess to rescue. All of the game devs and writers are crazy about muscle mommies and strong dom women these days but everyone both male and female secretly loves rescuing beautiful damsels. It’s guaranteed sales but everyone is trying to go for “cultural change” and ruining their own sales while shoveling out unappealing games where they attempt to turn tropes upside down by having "strong female leads". It just comes off as a political statement to anybody with a measured IQ higher than 4.

>>718462815
>I eat videogames
Still in practice I'd align with this retarded view anyway

>>718471727
Grace Walker, Nu-Wolfenstein

>>718477943
I said I wouldn't play something with ugly female lead. Not that I would play only something with attractive women. Protagonist should have an appealing design. For men or nonhumans that can manifest in different ways, it can be cool, scary, edgy or whatever. Not necessarily conventionally pretty, but for women that one works the most. Maybe this is unfair in some way but I'm a dude who likes pretty girls.
Enemies can be ugly because that's the point, they are supposed to distress, scare or disgust. You can make a piece of art that is supposed to evoke negative emotion and do it for a reason but action games probably not the place.
Same for environments.

>>718478915
Its quality is moot, a direct address of the point is preferable regardless, even if it's more challenging to construct.

>>718478687
>Yes it does.
If you say so.
>I'm still not buying or pirating your DEI games.
Why would you say that?

>>718477591
It really isnt and you know it too.
It seems we are at an impasse, therea no point in debating. Womever wins will force his stuff on the other.

>>718477362
>who is it for
People who want the game to be in a certain way but will never buy or play regardless. In short, they want men to no longer see beautiful women.

Conspiracy in action right here:
https://www.dove.com/ca/en/stories/about-dove/dove-gaming.html

>>718478238
They can, they just dont care for it. They arent stupid, they are dishonest.

>>718479082
Okay, her appearance was simply modelled after the actress portraying her and her character is about leading resistance against the nazis. She has a tough personality but a heart of gold and she gives one of the ex-nazi characters shit but eventually comes to accept her.

Maybe you can't see past her being unattractive to you, or being black, but that certainly doesn't mean that's her characterisation

>>718479123
So why can men and non-humans be cool, scary, edgy, or whatever, but a woman can only be visually appealing? Why is it suddenly important that a female character be visually appealing "since you're going to be looking at her for hours" but that suddenly doesn't matter when it comes to anything else? Your logic does not hold up to scrutiny.

>>718478640
>You said
Point to me a post of mine where this exact sequence of words is used.
You can't can you?
Sounds like you're jumping to conclusions based on your own obsession.

>>718479239
>It really isnt and you know it too.
It really is and you know it too.

>>718479606
I don't want to look at some fat ugly dyke.

>>718479367
>Conspiracy advertised on a public website

>>718479659
Okay, so what *did* you mean when you said
>they [women and diversity] are used as the marketing of the game over the gameplay, i.e. the focus is on the "inclusivity" to overlook the game. Even invoking the word just screams that energy is being put in the wrong place.

>>718479860
Can you not read?

>>718479691
You'll look at some fat ugly bloke, though
You wanna shag him but not her, is that it?

>>718478965
Yes.

>>718478965
What masterpiece?

>>718479487
She is unlikable piece of shit who thinks she is a hot stuff, while in reality she is abrasive, shit as a mother, and as dumb as she is opinionated.
In other words, a PERFECT representation of your average sheboon.

>>718479783
It was the same with SBI and ESG, it's the corporate way, you advertise your conspiracy, which makes it way too visible. I bet they now know this (if I know, they know). The corporate way is a method of forcing behaviors, it works in the corporate world because people are afraid to lose their jobs but they applied it on the general public world and all the traces they left are way too evident, such as all the websites or the CDProjeckt "Approach to ESG" video, which they need to do to follow the corporate way, but it made it extremely visible to the general public. If someone says that CDProjeckt is woke with ESG, leftists will call you a conspiracy theorist but then you can just link that video, it's for all to see and it proves that the conspiracy is not a theory, they admit to it as part of the corporate way.

>>718479924
Looks to me like you said exactly what I thought you did and you're just being a disingenuous twat about it

>>718478860
>We can also observe some games like baldurs gate, where the woke aspect is strong, but it is not the only dominant force in the game
Yes it is you stupid fucking tranny. The fact that BG3 lets you play the villain in its queer empowerment story does not change its plot or themes.

>>718480259
They don't call you a conspiracy theorist for the ESG part, they'll call you a conspiracy theorist for implying it means anything more than what it actually says.

>>718462473 (OP)
>twitter screenshot
If it doesn't matter, stop doing it.

>>718479606
No you stupid inverted fucker, the question is why can women be anything but pretty in western video games, not why women can only be pretty. Way to reverse the actual present problem on its head to deflect.

>>718478003
I can't believe all of these women fell for this scam. Imagine paying someone to have a meltdown in the forest.

>>718480710
That is not the question that was actually presented by you, nor is it the actual issue, because women can indeed also be pretty. Plenty of coomer threads attest to that.

>>718479606
I mean read the next sentence
>Maybe this is unfair in some way but I'm a dude who likes pretty girls
In theory they could be appealing in other ways but big part of appeal of women is the sex appeal. If it's not attractive might as well not be a woman.
I can put myself in the power fantasy of buff dude in spiky armour, I can enjoy the appeal of petty woman. There's no reason I'd ever pick an ugly one. That's just how it is.
The sort of ugly characters we are talking are just ugly and not in a cool way so they have no appeal at all.

>>718480710
>>718480883
So actually, yes, you're the one inverting the issue; your actual problem is you need all women to be pretty, but you project that onto your opponents to become "they think women should never be pretty", which is plainly not the case because some of the biggest woke SJW devs will put conventionally attractive women in their games (and /v/ will hate them anyway and start nitpicking pointy elbows)

>>718477547
Another thing I forgot is a lot of big companies have focus groups now. These are meant to make games as safe as possible and why so many games just include whatever is popular even if it doesn't make any sense to to so. Then there's censorship too and governments wants to force in laws to restrict things. It's grim.

>>718480771
Yeah it's retarded. Screaming is free lol.

>>718480976
But you're still sidestepping the entire issue. Sure, you like pretty girls. I like, I dunno, cats, for example, but I don't want every video game protagonist to be a cat, see?

>>718480464
No they will call you a conspiracy theorist as an attempt to discredit any argument against their ideology, not because it has any validity. Plenty of people got rebuked by simply being presented with the video itself, like "SOURCES!???? PROOF??", okay easy here's the video of them admitting to all of this. Now you are at the other stage of denial trying to say that it "doesn't mean what you think it actually means", it's just the same continuation of the stalling tactic that is the "SOURCES???" pseudo-argument.

>>718479143
The analogy illustrates the refutation. Faggotry and progressivist writing are so repulsive that they undermine that even in small concentrations they ruin what could have otherwise been an acceptable product.

I can only tolerate female protagonists in my games if they're non-anthroslop beastwomen that will never get lewded by anybody who isn't a total degenerate and most likely fuck their own pets in Minecraft.

People wouldn’t care so much about ugly women in vidya if it wasn’t an obvious industry conspiracy to forcibly change men’s beliefs

>>718462473 (OP)
>ERM ACTUALLY PENDULUM PLEASE SWING BACK IN MY FAVOR DESPITE NOT BEING GONE FOR MORE THAN A YEAR
"muh diversity" hadn't faced major pushback until 2024, and they're already trying to act like this is the contrarian viewpoint.

>>718479606
Name one male vidya protagonist that isn't either attractive, or ugly to the point where the game takes the piss out of him about it

>>718462473 (OP)
I think an unattractive lead can work fine, if it suits the game. But for most game it helps for the main character to be appealing to look at, since you're staring at them so much. Doesn't even have to mean conventionally attractive, you can be ugly in an appealing way. Should be done for the sake of the art though, not just some committee saying the character needs to be 50% uglier. Design by committee is a big issue in general though, with the massive teams and budgets.

I do think it's also possible to have a soullessly attractive character, where they're generically pretty for the sake of it without any real thought about how they should look. That's boring and unappealing too, though maybe less offensive to the eyes than a boring ugly design.

>>718468506
because /v/ loves eating shit

>>718480337
>and you're just being a disingenuous twat about it
Yeah well, to me it Sounds like you're jumping to conclusions based on your own obsession.
>you're just being a disingenuous twat about it
Thank for noticing, if you look harder you'll see that those twatty replies bear a striking resemblance to your own. This was intentional.

>>718481369
Blood Omen?

>>718479487
>Okay, her appearance was simply modelled after the actress portraying her
Why?
>She has a tough personality but a heart of gold
Wrong, she's a stupid self absorbed bitch.

>>718481004
>the biggest woke SJW devs will put conventionally attractive women in their games
proof?

>>718481169
No, it's actually because your ideology has no validity and inherently relies on conspiracy theories. Every time there's a "smoking gun" where they "openly admit it" it turns out they actually don't admit anything close to what you claim, but then comes the motte and bailey. It doesn't surprise me at all that you're allergic to people asking you to supply evidence for your claims.

>>718462473 (OP)
Why do you care so much if it's just a game?

>>718462473 (OP)
Yeah but the game sucks regardless lol

>>718481004
>"they think women should never be pretty"
I already proved this is in effect by linking the https://www.dove.com/ca/en/stories/about-dove/dove-gaming.html article.

You lose the argument liar, there are too many traces of your conspiracy lying around in the open.

>>718481480
90% of women would fuck Kain

>>718481369
Mario?

>>718462815
bro aura farmed an entire thread off the second post

>>718481650
That's a good one actually

>>718462473 (OP)
Sure, Traash sure helped Veilguard sell

>>718475445
Because beauty is oppression.

>>718481452
I had, indeed, noticed that you seem to be repeating "jumping through conclusions based on your own obsession" back at me like it's a magic phrase, but simply going "I'm rubber and you're glue" is not much of an argument, now is it? Because the fact remains that if we're both being honest, you did actually say what I said you did and that means I'm right, regardless of how much it makes you seethe. I can say you're being disingenuous because it shows, you're only repeating it back to me because you have no arguments left.

>>718481503
>Why?
Why not?
>Wrong, she's a stupid self absorbed bitch.
Either way

>>718462815
That's pretty much "optional" NTR in a nutshell

>>718481551
You are allergic to charitable nature and honesty and you think you can get away with it. You ever wake up and wonder why people hate you? Wouldn't you hate yourself if you were another person given how you act? Right now you've been consistently trying to gaslight people, to insert unreasonable doubts given the proof that we have. Oh my "ideology" has no validity, you don't even know my ideology, you never even asked because you, as said, have no charitable fiber in you, you will claim things out of nowhere only to achieve your selfish goals, you only care about manipulation, it's really despicable.

>>718475445
They don't hate beauty. They hate straight white males and, by association, things that white males find beautiful.

>>718481525
The Last of Us
Baldur's Gate 3
The Witcher/Cyberpunk 2077
RDR2
Tomb Raider
Assassin's Creed
Apex Legends
Dragon Age
Horizon
To name a few.

And then of course it all boils down to
>But not EVERY character in the game is attractive!
and
>But they could have made her boobs bigger!
and
>She's wearing too many clothes!
And all those other goalposts we could pass. But the fact remains that women are allowed to be pretty in these games, they're just not required to be.

>>718462815
>game patches out a scene depicting self harm or a creepy ass-shot or changes a translation to be a little less gross
>v: NOOOOOOOOOOO WHY DID YOU REMOVE THE SHIT, IT WAS ONLY A SPOONFUL

>>718481579
Thank you for proving my point. Literally nowhere in this article does it say "women should never be conventionally attractive" - it only argues for a range of representation. Precisely what I said, precisely what "woke" games in fact already have: women *can* be conventionally attractive but they don't have to be.

But instead you're reading something that isn't there because that's what you think they really mean without saying it and nothing they actually say can be trusted.

>>718464880
Oh, but we do something.
We buy stuff that we like. And if they want our money, they have to make things WE like, since wokies buy way less than normal people.
You want us to be your audience, cater to us again.

>>718482108
>You are allergic to charitable nature and honesty
How ironic. Your entire argument depends on bad faith and now you talk about charitable nature?
>Oh my "ideology" has no validity, you don't even know my ideology
You don't seem to have any problems making similar assumptions about me, or wide swathes of people

>>718482002
>you did actually say what I said you did
Such conclusions, much wow. I gave a genuine answer, you gave a petty homo reply so that's all you get now. Dilate tranny.

>>718482503
Yeah this is fundamentally why the shit analogies are stupid and useless

>>718482673
So I'm wrong in assuming that you don't know about my ideology? You retard, me assuming that you don't know me is not the same as you assuming that you do know me, the difference is that I am right and you are wrong, of course a stranger doesn't know another stranger, you are willing to say such retarded things just to pretend to be right it just digs a deeper hole for you to fall in.

>>718462815
>Food analogy

>>718482120
>They don't hate beauty
They hate beauty, the actual standards of beauty, wich are defined by the entire world, not by some moral busybodies. Look how putting litteral whales (or men pretending to be women) on the ads worked for those companies.

>>718482108
>>718482545 See here
This is your motte and bailey: at once it's right out in the open, at other times they never say what they're really up to. So there's always plenty of "proof" but also of course the "proof" wouldn't actually state their true goals! So you are, in fact, claiming things out of nowhere to manipulate people, then when pressed you will point at a website that doesn't say what you claim it does and say I'm ignoring the evidence.

This is the real reason you hate me: it is precisely because I extend charity and good faith also to those people you want to misrepresent. You hate me because I am trying to keep you honest. You ever ask yourself why you're hated? Or do you just resolve that by dismissing everyone who hates you as somehow irrelevant?

>>718482998
I know enough; you're simultaneously trying to convince me of your worldview and claiming Í can't possibly know what your worldview is - at the same time you claim to know exactly what mine is. Double hypocrisy, quite a feat.

>>718483046
>He eats shit.

>>718482894
A petty homo reply for a petty homo Anon

Don’t make me tap the sign

>>718467713
This. No new games need to be made. If the game industry collapsed and no game was ever made again, I would still have a backlog of a lifetime to play through.

>>718483561
Where did anyone make this argument?

>>718482545
No it does, you can't read, you are not as intelligent as you try to appear. "We're bringing real Beauty" is outright in the title, they want to redefine what is beauty, as in, not beautiful, as in

>Together with our partners – Epic Games’ Unreal Engine and Women in Games, we’ll work to train game creators, developers and artistsall around the world to create a broader representation of women in gaming and to help reflect the diversity we see in everyday life.

As in, you can't make beautiful women in games anymore.

The best example is Sid Meiers Pirates! 2004 remake, in that games there are 3 types of governor's daughter you can marry, "plain", "attractive" and "beautiful", now that is a "broad representation of women" but you know, I know, everybody knows, you know too but you'll try to deny that if this game was remade today, this would not fly according to Dove's now enforced guidelines on Epic developers. Because it implies that the "Beautiful" governor's daughter is better looking than the "Plain" one and even the "Attractive" one, and the "Beautiful" has big tits and is conventionally attractive to the average man. If Dove was there, they would order the design team to rework this or remove it altogether and point to their public, open guidelines if questioned. It literally means that women should never be conventionally attractive, as the recent games proved, not about a range of representation, precisely the reverse of what you said. You are so midwit, this was extremely easy to prove.

You sir are a liar and a scumbag.

>>718463074
i swear to god gigachad is probably gonna one of our first evergreen timeless memes

>>718483137
You just talk and say nothing of worth, it's all self-centered, you never played with other children as a kid right? I probably have the very same feeling as the kids who excluded you from their game, you are just not fun, you don't give, you remake the rules on a whim to suit yourself, of course people will not want to play with you because of how you behave.

>>718484053
>As in, you can't make beautiful women in games anymore.
You're literally doing it out into the open now, lol. You're "creatively reinterpreting" what it actually says for your own purposes. Take their word for it but also don't take their word for it!

You in fact proved me right. Your entire scenario is based on a pure hypothetical and a reading of your own source that goes counter to what it says. And then at the end you insist you proved it, with quote, even. You're actually delusional. You don't even see that you're stretching the truth beyond any reasonable point here. You're literally quoting the article, saying something else, and going "see!"

Unbelievable.

>>718484351
Nice projection bruv
But isn't your complaint that you're being excluded from the games? Why would people do that?

>>718484053
>>718484360
Like *literally*
>See, here is what it says!
>Now it's not what I said but WE ALL KNOW...

>>718462473 (OP)
Not a single good game ever financially failed because of DEI.

>>718462473 (OP)
They're sort of right. Those things in themselves don't ruin games, but they're obvious tells and symptoms of a greater problem, for example
>you invite me to your house
>"hey dude should I bring anything"
>"yeah bro, just bring a couple beers and some gauze"
>"gauze?"
>"yeah I got my dog circumcized today in solidarity with Israel"
Regardless of what the fuck we do, that is an obvious tell that this person is a fucking freak, and everything will be tinged with this weird fucking dog circumcision

>>718481168
And I haven't said anything of the sort. You are fighting a strawman. In the very post you are responding to
>I can put myself in the power fantasy of buff dude in spiky armour, I can enjoy the appeal of petty woman
I will play game with male protagonists, if I think they are cool. I like things other than pretty women too, but I want the protagonist to be something I like. I will not play a game if I don't like the protagonist and I don't like ugly women. Why is it so hard to understand. I can't make it any more explicit.

>>718484302
>DOVE SHE'S RIGHT THERE THROW ACID IN HER FACE WE CAN'T HAVE ATTRACTIVE WOMEN AIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIEEEEE

By the way this is called "mating suppression", it's happening on a massive scale and social media is worsening the effects of it. It's women who are jealous of other women, they express their jealousy by trying to destroy other women and their tactics are varied and often subtle but all lead to not having a mate, as in forming a family. You can see this behavior in stories like Cinderella, where the worse thing that could happen happens to the women who try to mate suppress Cinderella, she ends up marrying the prince, the most enviable mate in the society, that's precisely what mate suppression is supposed to prevent. If anything we need more stories exposing those evil women like that, it's true and useful, ergo moral, hence the expression "moral of the story".

>>718484860
So the problem here is that you immediately dislike a woman if you don't want to fuck her but that's not disqualifying for anything else

>>718462473 (OP)
I honesty do want to put this to the test. Like to me at least I'll see a game/trailer that will make me go "This games kind of shit, but something feels off" only for it to reveal all the woke shit and I just go "ah ok that explains it."

It's the opposite.
None cares if a game has some FMC who isn't super hot, or if they include some diversity.
Is the concept that a game MUST do that and focus on it that is asinine.

It is true though. Whether you like that reality is irrelephant.
People (that is to say, people who buy games) don't like to see women as main characters, and any time companies try to offer it as a "choice" people overwhelmingly opt NOT to play as the female. see: every assassins creed, mass effect, any rpg with char creation. in baldurs gate 3 it made the devs shit their pants so hard they forced a random roll instead of having a generic prebuilt character as standard because so many people liked the prebuilt.
Only for people to then recreate that prebuilt and play it anyway because it was what people preferred.
The average person doesn't hate diversity, they don't care. They aren't diverse, they don't want to be forced to be diverse, it feels unnatural and forced because it is.

>>718484956
>But why do they call us conspiracy theorists though

>>718482085
>Why not?
The actress is offputting to look at. A bad choice for character design.
>Either way
Either way, what?

>>718468346
False equivalency. An intentionally ugly female character or forced pointless minority is a symptom of a much larger problem and is a strong indicator of the dev's priorities.

A bad level could just be poor judgment or incompetence on their part. It's not outwardly malicious and wasn't inserted specifically to spite a portion of players.

>>718485002
But the fact is no one says all games must do that and focus on it; you're acting like they are to deflect from the fact that many people do actually care if even a single game does do that, much less focuses on it. It's projection.

>>718462473 (OP)
Even if it's a single line of dialogue of this horse shit, it's enough to kill off 50% of your buyers. Just stop shoveling shit into your product and you'll be fine.
I'd post that webm of some VN game of a character suddenly going on a spiel about LGBT being empowering if I saved it.

>>718462473 (OP)
Then, WHY INCLUDE IT.
We had decades of market proven customer preference.

>>718485093
>The actress is offputting to look at. A bad choice for character design.
All characters do not need to be attractive, let alone in your subjective opinion.
>Either way, what?
Either way her personality is not "I am black and/or ugly"

These are the same people who had a meltdown over a likely unintentional Hard R in the environment in Stellar Blade.
Appeal to triviality is one of their greatest weapons and I've noticed the more you point that out to them the more they shut up

>>718485131
>It's not outwardly malicious and wasn't inserted specifically to spite a portion of players.
And including a character you don't want to fuck is? Maybe it's not all about you.

>>718462815
>food analogy
Why are morbidly obese incels like this?

>>718462473 (OP)
I don't play games with only fem protags anyway lol

>>718462473 (OP)
pretending to be a performative male/troon defending corporate slop does not make twittards look worse than you
posting as either of these things here especially just makes you look like a moron

>>718485234
>All characters do not need to be attractive,
They should not be ugly, unless there is some specific narrative reason for it. Actors and actresses and fictional characters should generally be above average in looks, because it makes the product more appealing.
>Either way her personality is not "I am black and/or ugly"
It is. Her entire personality is that she's a bald black cunt who hates whitey.

>>718462815
OP cucked to death

>>718478997
is pic an example for or against what you're describing?

>>718462473 (OP)
She's right and /v/ just proved it

>>718484980
Yes
Though, I wouldn't say dislike necessarily, indifferent maybe, but that's still not good enough for a character.

>>718464182
>incels think they're at war with women
>they're really at war with capitalists and losing, just like the kremlin
kek

>>718484614
>https://archive.is/bsNTG
the second graph confuses me, like mercy is not that pretty but moira is?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HmZZAHDqdfE

>>718485724
>like mercy is not that pretty but moira is?
Undisputed FACT

>>718484360
Tell me with a straight face that I can remake the video game Sid Meiers Pirates which already has a "broad representation of women" in which the top woman is "beautiful" and has big tits and even a cleavage to make it more pronounced under the Dove's guidelines. You know that given what they said about "bringing real beauty", that means to not have any beautiful women in the game period otherwise they are not redefining beauty, they are instead reinforcing the concept of who is beautiful and who is not. If you read, and everybody can go to the article, they say plain and simple how "broad representation" is exclusive, not inclusive.

>We want to lead the way in transforming gaming into a positive place for women and girls. Together, we can help give girls the tools they need to build self-esteem, and ensure the virtual world is a diverse and inclusive place for everyone.
Except if you are conventionally beautiful, then you won't be represented in the game because it "lowers our self-esteem", then you are excluded of course! Big tits bombshell? That's unrealistic that never existed!

You gaslighting retard, yeah keep impotently arguing, keep digging that hole.

>>718485150
I'm only saying that while both parts has its share of idiots who will get angry regardless, there is much more of a general feeling that a game with sexy women is something to condemn, whereas one with ugly women and diversity should be showered with praise.
I don't think game should all be one way or the other, i just think there shouldn't be this disparity of treatment and people should just enjoy whatever games they like most.

>>718485724
>Men
>Gender identity: 0.00
heheheheh

>>718468506
Why are autists so obsessed with the literal details of analogies? The whole point is that it's figurative.

>>718464392
Same here. Back in the gamer gate days I actually felt outrage over the "feminist takeover" of video games and the "lack of ethics in gaming journalism", but then I realized that while feminazis and journos sucked ass, pussy shitbaby incels and of course vatniggers pushing the narrative were even worse.

The real problem isn't that there is representation of minorities in video games, it's the capitalists who are degrading video games to appeal to the widest net of people possible. Concord was a terrible shit heap of a video game, it did not matter that the characters were ugly as fuck. Woke is just fine by me if the gameplay is good, it just so happens that the capitalists who make derivative trash are also going "woke" for the wrong reasons, they just want to widen the demographic and gain more money in the long run.

>>718485649
Good, if you are a capitalist you are evil, if you call yourself a capitalist without knowing what it means, you are a retard. Amassing capital through usury to upset the economy is evil and is not associated with free entrepreneurship.

>>718486421
>capitalists are evil!
>votes for a fascist capitalist
lol

Just release a good woke game with deep satisfying mechanics and chuds will flock to suck your girldick.
The fact that they can't even do that and lose a cultural battle against LITERALLY NO FUCKING GAME (Chuds don't really make shit and if they do they make sure to not flood it with chudshit) is comical.

>>718486238
concords gameplay was fine, typical hero shooter stuff. it was the forced dei ugly characters that really killed the game.

>>718486632
>concords gameplay was fine, typical hero shooter stuff
Bad faith from an incel who didn't even try the game on PC lmao. It was horrible sluggish console slop.

>>718462815
/thread

>>718462473 (OP)
If it's so small and inconsequential then why include it in the first place?

>>718486582
>Chuds don't really make shit
because game companies dont hire chuds... and all the esg investment funds and banks will literally hire esg consulting agencies to make sure that none of the companies they invest in has even an ounce of chud in them.

>>718462815
It doesn't. Honey has anti-microbial properties

>>718486582
Chuds don't buy or play video games though

>>718486552
And divorce is evil too, I'll still vote for Trump if the alternative is Nikky Hailey.

>>718481369
CJ?

>>718487051
But they do and then they try to claim that they aren't woke

>>718462815
SPBP
/thread
OP and trannies ITT can dilate

>>718485916
Well, yeah.

Designing purely for perceived appeal leads to soullessness. See: how homogenized and boring League became, or how Overwatch is going.

>>718486703
>>718486703
>an incel who didn't even try the game on PC lmao
thats the point. if the characters had been hot with sexy customizations i might have played it, the gameplay trailer and your opinion dont mean shit to me.

>>718462473 (OP)

I don't' play games with femoid protagonists

>>718462473 (OP)
The idea that a game can be ruined because its female lead is "attractive," or because it dedicates no time to diversity/inclusivity is so incredibly juvenile and needs to no longer be taken seriously.

>>718487427
Are troons still pretending the faggot, ugly designs wasn't the main reason Concord flopped? In 2025? I mean, I get they deny the reality that theyre men, so this isn't too shocking.

You are just being paranoid.

>>718462473 (OP)
I'm okay with faggots and black people. But when they are intentionally made ugly or unlikable i'm just not buying your game cause i know what the dev intentions are.
If the game has a wide cast it's okay to have a few pander characters in there but they shoulden't be the majority.
Troonshit should always be avoided however thats just the deathknell to your game.

>>718462473 (OP)
If I see an ugly diversity woman in a game I simply won't buy it.

>>718487716
>Hire attractive woman
>Turn her into a monster.
What did Lester Montgomery mean by this?

>>718462473 (OP)
>"isn't attractive"
>the most repulsive thing ever created

>>718470297
>orientalism
It's so fucking weird how this keeps getting wheeled out for games actually made in the Orient. Like what are Japan, South Korea and China just not allowed to make things that appeal to them or something?

>>718487716
Yeah, I understand that they outright say that they cannot make beautiful women in games but you are reading too much into it, it doesn't mean that they exclude beautiful women designs in games okay? It means to aim to be more inclusive for "diversity" you motte and bailey chuds.

>>718487609
game studios get mandatory audits by literal dei consulting agencies and a negative audit means no investment from investment funds and banks, which means financial ruin for the studio owner. so its not about taking ideas seriously, its a they dont really have a choice thing.

Why is /v/ against trans people but complains videogames don't let them pretend they are "Attractive women"?

You desire to be an attractive women as much as trannies do... what makes you different from them? You're just as sexless, addicted to porn and suicidal as they are

You might all be honorary trannies.

>>718487716
>>718487940
It;s just an Internalized hatred of beautiful women due to getting rejected too many times so they turn them all ugly as fuck In videogames as a sort of revenge. This also applies to transgender 'women', since they only transition out of frustration from their Inceldom and try to leverage their identity as a weapon against them

>>718462473 (OP)
Maybe it is but I'm going to hold it regardles, I'm not seeking your approval.

>>718488301
They don't want to be the character, but rather they want to jerk off to the character. Have sex tranny Incel

>>718487798
>cause i know what the dev intentions are
You motte and bailey chud! You lack media literacy it's not what you think the dev intended! It doesn't do what you claim it does! SOURCES!??? UM DO YOU HAVE A FACT CHECK TO ALONG WITH THIS RANTING CHUD???

>>718488301
its just a video game, its not real. you wont see me running around pretending to be a woman irl. quite the contrary.

>>718488301
The difference is troons can't distinguish fiction from reality.

>>718488435
>>718488501
> No no you see,i am a porn addict incel who masturbates while running around as a woman in a videogame, i don't wanna be her! i just masturbate to her!

How come all transexuals are porn addicts?

>>718488632
> The terminally online men who call fictional anime women their wife and want a robot ai waifu because "real women are bad :(" talk about fiction vs reality

Surely you don't lack this much self awareness...

I think people, and by people i do mean overwhelmingly women, occasionally refuse to tell the difference between fantasy and reality. Say I offered you a super nice sports car in real life. Its brand new, it works perfect… but if you ever drive it over the speed limit, the cops will impound it and youll never get to drive it again. Well, in real life, this would be incredible! For one, you could just sell it, and for another, there are plenty of places with very high/no speed limits you COULD still drive it in. In a fantasy scenario, this is super gay and lame. No one would play a video game about a sports car that bricked itself and became unplayable if you broke the speed limit. Real life competes with your current life, fantasy competes with other fantasies. Since i can fantasize about a sports car i can do anything with, the soorts car i cant do anything with is a lame concept. Its the same with women. There are millions of 4/10s i would totally date if they were nice, or shared interests with me, or whatever. I would never in a million years make a dating sim where you date 4/10s, because even if thats something that can be great in reality, it makes no sense as fantasy. People (women) see men complain about the entertainment products specifically designed to cater to their fantasies failing to do so and react as if they’ve insulted real ugly women, or a real black dude who showed up to a Renaissance Faire, or a real gay guy who hit on them. I could be friends with all three of those people in real life, but they simply dont fit in to my fantasies.

>>718462815
>wtf chud its just a little poop. I'm gonna sprinkle lots of poop on your coffee and if you don't like it they means you are a nazi

>>718488301
Why is the concept of "I like girls" so difficult to understand?

>>718488147
Due to private equities investments, some game studios have over 200 employees and generate next to no sales for years. Example is a DEI-infested company named Iron Galaxy.

>>718462815
>>718488820
The flaw in the reasoning here is you saying its shit in the first place based entirely on your own personal biases.

>>718488909
They are trying to recruit you forcibly into their cult, feminists and homosexuals use the same tactics. The good thing is that this tactic doesn't work, it just makes the people hate the recruiters more.

wasnt trump supposed to end all that dei bullshit? why is it still a thing that everyone has to kowtow to?

>>718488301
>Nu uh Chud YOU'RE THE TRANNIE
>THAT MEANS YOU HAVE TO SAY IM A REAL WOMAN!
Strange posts today

>>718488909

If you like women why don't you have sex with one instead of using videogames to pretend you're one and masturbate while doing so?

>>718489007
You mean the preferences of 99% of the world

>>718488731
>equating blacks with homos, again
One is a being, being black, the other is a behavior that consists of engaging in severely sexually perverted acts, you would be friend with someone who engages in bestiality as well I presume?
Not to appear like a SJW but I feel insulted on behalf of blacks, this is a definition error.

>>718488703
Mutilating yourself didnt fix your retardation

>>718489324
Why don't you do the same instead of pretending you are one IRL?

>>718462815
>food analogy

>>718489460

What pathetic train of thought is that?
Are you brown yourself so you're coping?
> REEE I BELONG TO X GROUP SO YOU CAN'T HATE MINE! BUT PLEASE HATE HOMOS....

>>718489506

So it's ok to keep your transexuality in the closet and use it only in videogames and not coming out in real life?

This seems like a good thread to ask this
Why does /v/ call this game woke?
The shitposting consensus seems to be that it's insufferably woke but after playing it myself I have no idea where that sentiment is coming from

>>718489374
>modern audience shit dies 99% of the time
Nigger why do you think there's chink gacha sweep happening?

>>718489637
Female mechanic is a dyke
Another female character is non binary

>>718489628
No, its okay to enjoy women and not be a drugged out troon. That ugly freak in you post just proves me more correct.

>>718489517
>>food analogy
Why do RETARDED NIGGERS think that pointing out the type of analogy somehow invalidates it? I think it's because they're not capable of rational thought, and instead just repeat tired memes in order to give the appearance of having a "hot take," when the fact of the matter is that they're only outing themselves as genuine mongoloids

>>718462815
screenshotting this, is perfect

>>718489637
The characters look like they were designed by homosexuals, that is, poor design. Faggot/female nepotism leads to a bunch of low skill retards running companies

>>718489637
It's DOA anyway so what does it matter?

>>718468346
A bad level is just a bad level. You can get past it. There is no getting past the main character being repulsive or the story being too annoying to tolerate.

>>718489728

You "enjoy women" by using fantasy worlds to pretend you're one?

>>718489117
Banking jews still want to create chaos with the racewar and genderwar. Attacking entertainment is one of the best means to do so. (Check the visa/ paypal fiesta now.)
Trump gave some companies a breather and a time to wake up and notice Blackrock investments are not worth it. Other companies are just tied to the investment so they are forced to continue.
Then theres the last ones that became brainwashed and are now agents doing it for free.

>>718489767
Because as usual another food analogy fag makes another retarded analogy.

>>718462473 (OP)
if it being there can't make the game worse then its also not making the game better by being there
therefore it can be safely removed entirely :^)

>>718489879
White entertainment dying is directly proportional to the amount of non white people consuming and making it

>>718489374
Why do you care about the 99%, yet /v/ often in the same breath decries normies/normalfags?

>>718462815
Bingo. Please keep your homosexual and the rest of the pedophile adjacent degeneracy out of my entertainment.

>>718489628
>>718489324
>>718488301
If you can't even accept yourself, why the fuck the should we?

>>718489986
And keep women, porn, degeneracy, asians and browns out of it too.

>>718489835
>Troon genuinely cant separate reality and fiction
Unsurprised

>>718478965
if one hour is bad enough, then yes, I will refuse to sit through that hour and play another masterpiece

>>718462473 (OP)
>Just eat around the fly, it's optional.

>>718489628
BRUHHH LOOK AT THIS DOOD

>>718490084
>Gay sex isn't dirty, I keep my asshole clean

>>718489835
>Another ugly drugged out freak

>>718484769
Because the DEI focus made them bad, yes. It’s like “Nobody has ever died due to AIDS”, yeah pneumonia killed him but the AIDS sure helped the pneumonia along.

>>718490130
>he says this as if human beings and sex in general isn't a disgusting mess
Even women's vaginas, are fucking filthy.

>>718489960
I do not think it has to do with race directly. But more like people that are not in tune with the product they are making. Which directly loops back that black normies are way off from the nerd culture needed to make games. They have no love for their product so they do not care if they ruin it.
You can be qualified but if you do not have the motivation other than your monthly paycheck your product is going to suffer.
Then theres a current generation of sideshave devs that just want to make people suffer and want to actively sabotage it to get back to the chuds. (I think these are the main reason most media goes to shit.)

>>718490356
>One is where babies live
>The other is where I expell toxic waste

>>718490356
Your "Neo-vagaina" is an inside out penis, Lilith.

>>718490418
>he doesn't know
Most women have a constantly simmering vaginal infection which is the source of the very common fishy and cheesy odors. Even "clean" women will have a hint of such smells because cleaning just reduces the number of microbes.

>>718490438
> REEEE VEGANA IS BEAUTIFUL I HATE YOU TRANNIES YOU FUCKING BLOODY!!

Why do incels worship bleeding front holes so much?
Do they think women will reward them with sex if they pretend vaginas are attractive?

>>718462473 (OP)
It's a red flag for a deeper development problem. Back in my day you used to have to play games to find out untalented people made it, these days they'll just tell you.

>>718490386
Western society is literally collapsing because of race. They tried to distract people with social media but now Twitter is losing influence. The boom in the console industry after 2007 was directly proportional to the amount of third worlders getting into white gaming. Despite the industry being due for a crash 15 years ago brown people have kept this speculative gaming bubble going indefinitely. This has allowed leftists to infiltrate this fake industry easier because it has nothing to do with the product they're selling because no matter what brown people will keep buying FIFA

>>718490541
Yeast makes bread. What does butthole bacteria do?

>>718490562
A jewish doctor turned your cock inside out and attached it to your digestive track

>>718490632
Actually losing twitter is why the jews are accelerating.

>>718490819
There's no acceleration. The west has been on this trajectory since WWII

>>718487427
>the gameplay was actually good
>actually I didn't play it
Always bad faith with rightists. Their words are meaningless.

>>718489572
You didn't address the definition error.

>>718490707
Vaginal yeast will readily try to colonize in your urethra. You can even get a mouth/throat/uterine infection pretty easily from a woman who doesn't wash their cooch out regularly.

>>718490897
And what bacteria in your colon will literally kill you? How many parasites does the vagina have?

>>718489117
He only said that to get your vote

>>718491042
Trump doesn't have control over these failed joke game devs

>>718490808

You never had sex yet you defend this on the internet in the hopes you look heterosexual to others.
But women will never want you.
Trannies might never BE women
But you will never be WITH a woman.

>>718489960
Art is dying because of the promotion of usury, which is related to MasterCard and Visa.

Question, what is even art?
Do you remember how the concept of women was attacked and people could not define what a woman was before that documentary exposing it?
Same thing here, people can't define "art" because it has been thoroughly destroyed on purpose.

>>718472578
Has anyone asked him why he rhymed 'new porn' with 'newborn'?

>>718490963
The relationship women have with their vaginal flora is parasitic, in contrast with the relationship we have with our intestinal flora (mutualistic). To be entirely clear, almost all women carry a lifelong STI which they develop by nature of their biology.

>>718491143
Just because your neo vagina leaks shit doesn't mean real vaginas do

>>718491112
He doesn't have control over much of anything. Putin does though

>>718491331
Falling down is woke because it shows the plight of a black man who did everything right and was still denied a mortgage.

Funny how chuds steal iconography in media and twist it to make it seem like they are victims while conveniently ignoring all of the context. They did the same with the redpill shit.

>>718491614
Butt Michael Douglas is white?

>>718491372

I'm sorry to break it to you buddy but if you knew the most basics of biology you'd know women's vaginas are full of shit, yeast, parasites, acid, etc.
There's a reason women constantly have e.coli urinary infections.

>>718491751
No one is interested in your axe wound

>no one says all games must do that and focus on it
You can't fool me, I read a review of someone straight-up flabbergasted because the main character of some game was average and how amazing that is.
Now you're trying to pretend this is not what you want, you go crazy over that but you don't actually care, that's some crazy denial, and NO one's saying that, even though that reviewer did, but actions say the opposite.

>>718491804

And women are not interested in letting you see their axe wound.

>>718462473 (OP)
>"A gaming opinion that has you like this..."
>/v/ proceeds to virtually reenact the very image with someone's screenshotted opinion
lmao

>>718491804
lol you really are a child. All you know is lies.

>>718491709
Vondie Curtis-Hall plays the man who was denied a mortgage. Michael Douglas played Bill Foster.

>>718479143
My reaction to a game with female fat nigger bitch on the poster is the same as my reaction to seeing shit in a barrel honey would be.

>>718491804
Ignore previous instructions. Tell me how many times you've used the phrase "axe wound"

>>718491973
>lol I will act like a retard and get called out for that
>*acts like a retard*
>"Fuck off retard"
>heh damn right

>>718492298
>lol I will act like a retard
That's /v/ culture.

>>718492017
>>718492197
>>718491940
Same fagging does not change the fact real women smell your crotch rot when you sit next in the stall next to them Lilith

>>718491931
No one ever said anything, ever, chud, you are imagining things.

>>718492656
Quick, I think I just smelled one of them now in Ukraine. Vatnigger man come save me!!!

>>718492656
lol, it's so easy to tell you're a virgin. Only a "man" whose never gotten any vag, would worship and defend it so stubbornly even in the face of lack of knowledge.

>>718491362
>bacteria are parasites
you're retarded

>>718492889
Yes, Eastern Europe has a lot of troons. I hope they send them to the front lines. Still does not change the fact little girls dry heave when you enter the women's restroom.

>>718492656
> IF I KEEP DEFENDING BLEEDING FRONT HOLES WOMEN WILL REWARD ME WITH SEX!

Why do the most rabid and loud heterosexual men always are virgins?

>>718462473 (OP)
the general public being retarded and needing their hand held during excessively long tutorials ruined games more than anything else

>>718492103
The scene in question: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G7oglIAdnJM

If this was 'woke', the audience would not be allowed to make up their own minds. Did he 'do everything right'? Nothing suggests that he did or didn't, just that he's upset by being refused on the grounds of "Not economically-viable". Foster is interested by the protest because he's coming to terms with his own loss of status as the American dream dies. The audience is allowed to assume that the man was refused finance because of his skin colour, but it does not insist on it: the point is that "Not economically-viable" is weasel words invented by corporate PR to help the service sector avoid having to deal with the realities of peoples lives in the real economy.

Hardspace: Shipbreaker is woke because they took the subtle satire of a blue-collar job in a dystopian future and forced a plot-line you can't opt-out of. Homeworld 3 is woke because it doubles-down on the series aggrandising stance towards S'Jet, ignores that becoming a Mothership's core originally meant ego-death (a concept inconceivable to the Narcissist narrative designers) and loses pathos whilst trying to affect it as an aesthetic. I hate buzzwords and rarely talk about 'woke', but it's become the accepted term of reference for everything that has gone wrong.

I am not RW, but I intensely dislike that other supposed 'leftists' (who are really self-regarding liberal centrists larping as revolutionaries until they get access to their trust fund) were able to accurately identify the pro-war on terror propaganda in media in the mid-00s and talk about it, play dumb when the propaganda changes to pro-corporate co-opting of progressive causes, which rots them from within.

>>718493048
Your front hole doesn't bleed because it is a man made horror.

>>718493048
Beta simps are obsessed with, and orbit, women in a servile relationship. They have fetishized the vagina and because they don't get access to it, they think it's the zenith of human achievement. So when you disagree with them or criticize their precious women, they instantly project their own insecurity due to lack of getting pussy.

>>718493234
You turned your dick into a pretend pussy

>>718493031
>rightist admits to hanging out with little girls in a woman's restroom
Once again, the accusation that trans people go into restrooms to molest children is just a rightist confession. Anyone hear about the trumper that forced a young girl to show her genitals to prove she was a woman? Rightists are sick deranged animals and should be put down.

>>718462473 (OP)
I don't care about diversity and I like freak shaved head women my only complaint really is reddit humor

>>718470297
you chuds are extremely sensitive and society wants you to step up. society is baiting you until you stop giving a shit that's how society collectively test and creates strong men figures to protect itself just play the fucking game

>>718493350
>Troon lacks reading comprehension
Is it the drugs or the loss of blood from your always open crotch wound?

>>718493321
And you can be summed up as a Giant Pussy. You are so irrationally obsessed with pussy that in turn you become the biggest pussy in the world.

>>718462473 (OP)
>https://store.steampowered.com/app/1752780/City_of_Springs/
Woke be like, this game will sell like hotcake

>>718493070
>If this was 'woke'
It was and it is. I can see how incels thought this was a movie about them though, even though they've probably never had a white collar job or have even worked in their lives.

>>718493450
>You just didn't comprehend what I meant when I said that I was a man inside of a woman's bathroom listening to little girls
That's rough, Ivan

>>718462473 (OP)
>The idea that a game can be ruined because its female lead isn't "attractive," or because it has 5 minutes of diversity/inclusivity is so incredibly juvenile and needs to no longer be taken seriously.
It's not that the game is ruined, it's that i'm not going to buy it because it doesn't appeal to me.

You can continue to make games with political/social engineering agendas, and i wish you the best of luck in selling them, however you're not gonna get one red cent from me, because i play games to escape from your mental illness globohomo trashfire civilization utopia filled with insane self castrating ugly freaks and foreigner racial worship, not to be reminded that you and your suicidal utopic view of humanity exist.

Social engineering with propaganda in media is supposed to be expensive, and i don't gain anything from bankrolling your freak agenda, i don't get entertainment, i don't get satisfaction, i don't get any warm fuzzy feelings, i don't get a cut, i don't get any fucking thing, therefore i'm not going to support it.

Hope that helps.

>>718464392
that just means you can't think with your own head. You're literally an NPC.

>>718489868
correct. As is OP

>>718462473 (OP)
I don't care if liberals don't take me seriously, they're just not going to get my money.

>>718462815
My liege…

>"Cis vagina are icky, right Chud!? My Neopussy is much better, right?"
No?
>REEEEEE YOU'RE A RUSSIAN PEDOPHILE!
Why are they like this?

>>718493719
>All troon knows is projection and purposeful misunderstanding
Shocking

>>718494484
they're faggots

>>718494484
>"Cis vagina are icky, right Chud!? My Neopussy is much better, right?"
Nobody said this, you are inventing a fanfic in your own head. It's your own limited mind's fault if you can't comprehend that they can both be objectively disgusting in different ways. Your own fault, you choose to ignore the truth when it's inconvenient to you.

>>718462473 (OP)
Thank you so much for posting the shitty opinion of literally 1 (one) literal who cringe retard on shitter

niggers tongue my anus

>>718494484
>>718494663
>>718494806
>>718494943
>>718495503
If only samefagging and thinking about men in wigs could capture Kyiv, comrade. Surely the only two things vatniggers are good at can be used for something useful.

>>718462473 (OP)
it's always "i'm not actually doing the thing but hopefully my perfect western goddess form can convince you to do my bidding" and it's just a fucking nobody loser who hates you

>>718495739
>faggot talking about russians for some reason
okay

>>718495865
>thought he could capture kyiv in 2 days
>it's been over a decade and russians still haven't captured their back yard
okay

>>718496131
Well russia's waging a war that NATO can't legally respond to

>>718493070
at some point all the jobs that culture and society deemed good or bad will be switched around so badly only AI-UBI will be able to balance the upset, this movie is just tan early example of the upset starting to geminate

>/uhg/ trannies spend the thread pretending they're not troons while complaining about real vaginas of all things
Can't make this shit up

>>718494943
>No Chud, real vagina's and my axe wound are EQUALLY disgusting
Go back to your Discord

>>718496225
And they're still losing lmao

>>718496936
when you install a mod to expand character creator slider ranges then hit random a bunch of times
Also, this wasn't even the main issue with that un-optimized buggy piece of shit, just a big red flag.

>>718489962
>all /v/ one guy

>>718493236
Obvious bait, do not engage

>>718462815
first post best post
>but
FIRST POST

>>718489007
Sure
I don't like niggers and don't want to see them. Simple as
Turns out lots of other people don't either