>>512957879
Never heard of controlled opposition? His hatred of Christ makes him have more in common with the Jews than Trad Europeans.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=728JMHxaJBw
It's a mistake to think Neo-Paganism automatically makes you based. There are plenty of bluehaired genderqueers in that camp who love African refugees.
I will say the original Pagans an improvement over the Atheists today. The Roman Empire crushed the child sacrificing Celts and Carthaginians. Had strong families and actually made an attempt at just laws and a moral society. But these Pagans converted to Christianity because they realized it was the Truth. Within 30 years of Pentecost there were riots in the streets of Rome over it. The Jews would often instigate attacks on early Christians. They spit on Christians and bomb churches in Israel now.

>>23057862
Yeah but, this is kind of deriving an is from an ought. It's "older" so it ought to be more accurate than the newer one. Yet, God provided the "newer" text as the Holy Scripture for millennia before this was rediscovered.
A lot of it stems from this atheistic and/or RadProt rejection of tradition and the miraculous.
These (((Critical))) types like to fixate on any differences found in the Dead Sea Scrolls and Codex Sinaticus, and ignore that they haven't really departed from the Textus Receptus and the Vulgate in any significant way.

I am Christian but I do believe we have a duty to defend ourselves and our people from existential threats. The whole turn the other cheek line is meant for insults and petty offenses.
When your country is being invaded, and the invaders are raping your women and children, killing your brothers, you have a duty as a Christian to defend them, ideally non violently but there is no sin in taking arms and using violence when all peaceful options have failed.
There is a long history of great Christian generals and soldiers