>>513087163
not really
female AI robots can replace women's role way easier than male AI robots can replace men's role
this is not a hard equation to figure out
it's very attainable for an AI female robot to be cute, supportive, submissive, help around the house, and be incredibly fuckable
meanwhile it's borderline impossible for an AI male robot to be the equavalent of a human 10/10 chad, and everything this entails
we will pretend like it's same thing, but it clearly isn't, and biocunts are getting the absolute dogshit end of the bargain, in the same way male's been getting it for almost a 100 years now

>>512076559
they're already coping
there will be AI companions for both sexes
key difference being that a female robot will fulfill her female role completely, while a male robot can't because of what you pointed out
robotwaifus are going to be the best wives in history
robothusbandos are going to be giant dildos for the foreseeable future

>>511466389
The timeframe is extremely important to guys like OP who are planning their lives around an irl deus ex machina and suggesting others do the same. It is dangerous.

>>511348046
and you turboniggers say robotwaifus are "unrealistic"
lmao

>>508636724
lmao, this

>>713357187
Don't be so sure, if f*ids sense they're backed into a corner and their pussy pass has no power soon they will cry to the government to ban them to preserve their leverage over men.