>>515996805
reminder they tried to downplay the antifa messages on the bullets

>>515572357
they walked that back

>A senior law enforcement official with direct knowledge of the investigation cautioned that the report had not been verified by A.T.F. analysts, did not match other summaries of the evidence and might turn out to have been misread or misinterpreted.
>https://www.nytimes.com/live/2025/09/11/us/charlie-kirk-shooting-news
welp

they retracted the statement but it doesnt really matter the right will just run with it anyway

CIS BULLETS CONFIRMED

They fucked up the investigation AGAIN.

>>64250890
Yeah the ATF is already backtracking on that, at least as of now