>>724371601
anon, why would anyone bother to continue past this point? you've literally been shown official examples that prove you wrong but you just reply
>the artist/modeler did it wrong
here, pay attention to the behavior of your terminally schizo braincells on this one.
here's official art by Naoki Ikushima himself.
>THE PRONOUNCED CURVE OF HER CHEEK IMPLIES A SNOUT
that's fucking bonkers, anon. it makes zero anatomical sense. a chubby cheek is not a snout. but, y'know what, let's set that aside for now.
here are multiple other examples of human characters with human faces and the same pronounced curve of their cheek. that is not indictive of a snout. it is indictive of baby fat. that is how Ikushima draws younger characters.
reply with your usual
>UM HER HEAD IS NOT TILTED AT AN EXACT 45 DEGREE ANGLE SO IT DOESN'T COUNT
or
>THE ARTIST DREW IT WRONG
all you like. i won't be replying again. enjoy that lonely grave up on Snout Hill.