>>106113628
>>Not even listing the radio primer in the OP
>for shame, anon. It's actually not bad, for once
>https://pastebin.com/9uYXMhVm
You are clearly a bit behind the curve on this, anon. The radio primer started here but evolved into the /ham/ FAQ, and now is posted regularly on >>>/diy/ham:
https://archive.is/PjR5s
https://mega.nz/file/UCgEGAjb#rwNcnMAQCUUbSp8supsFvn9QEHCWUW86eLcZa16ZG4Y