>>510957723
>Your brain is diseased and is only capable of operating on female logic now.
Nah, I'm just not as stuck up as you are when it comes to rleationships and sex.
>female logic
I've not expressed a single feminine idea.
All I did was point out the double standard that men too get shamed for their bodycounts, not just women.
That's a logical and deeply masculine way of thinking.
You're the one who has to resort religious peer pressure to get others to agree with you, which is very feminine.
>"This is just how it is" is only "how it is" because that's the system we've put into place in the modern world
Wrong.
A lot of it is simply natural. The roots of this logic are biological.
A man can have 100 children with 100 different women, but a woman can't have 100 children with 100 different men, it's simply not physically possible.
This simple biological reality is the basis for everything that comes after, including the fact that women HAVE to be picky. They don't really have a choice.
>in which the only thing that matters is the needs of the woman, and everything in society is subjugated to whatever makes her pussy wet.
Now you're going off topic.
You accuse me of being "gynocrentric" or a slave to the matriarchy, but you yourself are a fucking religious zealot that think men should be chaste, like women.
It seems you're the one that advocates for a pussycracy / matriarchy, my guy.
>Women can only live by the laws of the jungle, they can't live by logic, honor, truth, etc.
This statement is so wrong and weird that I don't even know how to adress it.
What do you mean
>Women can only live by the laws of the jungle
?
That makes no sense whatsoever.
I also don't take advice from losers like you.
I'm fairly attractive, have been in a relationshi^with my GF for a long long time, I don't need no christcuck zealot telling me how to live my life like a fucking monk and don't have sex unless it's once every few years, in missionary position and only for procreation.
