>>106973471
You are the illiterate one.
That pinned comment notes he was comparing past review data, which he rigged by downclocking the 5070 Ti by over -300MHz.
Relying on rigged benchmarks to prove a point, that's what Retardeons do.

>>106382818
You keep ignoring the part he described 5080 as part of "The Ultimate Gamers Bedroom".
>AMD FINE WINE! NVIDIA DRIVER OVERHEAD!
>'9800 + 5080, THE ULTIMATE GAMERS BEDROOM'

>>106349652
This idiot's continuing to post irreproducible results from Videocards Downclocked™ Steve.
>'A review unit with +30MHz higher advertised boost clocks can cause +3% performance delta!' (they can't)
>'So I'm totally justified to downclock the 5070 Ti's stock performance by 300MHz (or more) to cause a -7% performance delta to reviewers who don't fuck around!'