>>40619293
how casually your ignorance is displayed as you attempt too impose your will upon my agency. your the bot, your arguments presented too imaginary christians are you strawman, i read your post and it was shit, i will respond as i will
>>40619253 >I was exhibiting the inherent ambiguity of words.
which is why i stressed the multiplicity of words
>“God is a word” means two different things. It could be “God is literally a word” or “God is just a word we use to represent the undefinable most holy.”
god the most high is hardly the same as god God or g-d
