>>82279624

>Why are you arguing against scientific research at the same time you're trying to sell this small sample size study to me?

Science can be useful but it must be taken with a grain of salt with respect to certain topics because it has official narratives everywhere. If you are a cocksucking academic overinvesting into the research machine, that isn't my problem. But go ahead. Defend euphemistic labels for female craziness, defend Sudden Infant Death Syndrome when it's really just women committing infanticide, defend everything else about science if it's so absolute. You are everything that you hated in what you replaced - religion. You will always be behind what is the real truth just as you were with germ theory.

I never linked any study by the way. It was a screenshot cropped to put emphasis on the physical dimorphism of two men based on testosterone levels.

>>82261255

Then they go home to Chad and suck his dick. All these "bad bitches" and "girl bosses" doing their "girl math" annoys the fuck out of me too.

>>82261365

Another good one is situationship. All these foid mental gymnastics terms and euphemisms they invent to avoid bad optics. The worst offender by far is science though since it pretends towards objectivity, but in reality, covers for the foid's various mental aberrations and psychopathies with sugary terminology. This is best seen in labels for mental health disorders common to women and other developments like Sudden Infant Death Syndrome (SIDS) which is just women going crazy and smothering their infants. That's why SIDS inordinately and apparently inexplicably spikes during New Year's Eve because mommy can't go out partying and drinking with a baby around.

>>82157739

Why is science so cucked? I have a degree in a related field so I know what you're talking about. Normies are so quick to ask for "le evidence", "le studies", "le scientific method" as if scientists aren't pozzed political entities with an agenda themselves.