>>519364796
You're listing the results of 500 years of global plunder and calling it 'innate genius.' Australia was built with British capital, land stolen from Aboriginals, and resources shipped to a global market. Your 'advanced West' was built on gold from the Americas, rubber from the Congo, and spices from India. You're pointing to the loot and crediting the thief's DNA. It's a childish understanding of history. For most of human history, Europe was a backwater compared to the centres of civilization in China, the Middle East, and India.

Yes, red and blue exist as points on a spectrum, but nobody builds social systems, creates laws, or distributes wealth based on a person's wavelength. "Race" is the social and political process of drawing arbitrary lines on that human gradient (e.g., the "one-drop rule") to create hierarchical groups. The lines are not based on consistent genetic logic, they are based on historical power relations.

Your entire argument is circular. You point to the current wealth and power of the West which was built through a unique and brutal confluence of material factors like colonialism and the industrial revolution and you use that outcome as proof of an innate superiority that you claim caused the outcome. It's a just-so story that ignores 95% of actual history to flatter your own ego. The science of genetics and the study of history have left your 19th-century racial theories behind.