>>725675034
Yes, when analyzing a console's library you need to see the overall library AND the time period, the SNES library was like 9/10 for its time.
>what do you mean by "time period"
Objectively speaking the PS3's library is FAR better than the NES library, but the NES was also 9/10 for its time, the PS3 was somewhat disappointing.
PS2's library was 10/10 for its time, and remains extremely good even to this day. The Switch mentioned here >>725675195 for exemple, has like 4000 games, but it's a very mediocre system with more than half of its very best games being Wii U ports and uninspired sequels.
>>725675381
>n64 GC
lmao
Actual best libraries going by library + what was expected for the time is: PS2, PS1, SNES, NES.