7 results for "12039cde05d7e229031cf11f7d0fb16c"
>>151797053
>>151797042
do people actually watch youtube with ads? how absolutely soul crushing that must be.
Compiling UBlock Origin
Google has decided to play hardball with Ublock Origin. I need adfree gooning or I'm going to get blueballs. Should I just compile it from the source and load it in developer mode? I have already messed with the flags, but it seems like Google is messing with that option too. I realized that in the time I have been searching for config options I could have just compiled it. What work around are you using Anon? I'm using Chrome.

Google Chrome 140.0.7339.80 (Official Build) (64-bit)
Revision 670b6f192f4668d2ac2c06bd77ec3e4eeda7d648-refs/branch-heads/7339_41@{#3}
OS Linux
JavaScript V8 14.0.365.4
User Agent Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/140.0.0.0 Safari/537.36
Command Line /usr/bin/google-chrome-stable --flag-switches-begin --enable-features=UnexpireFlagsM138,UnexpireFlagsM139 --flag-switches-end --ozone-platform=wayland --render-node-override=/dev/dri/renderD128
Executable Path /opt/google/chrome/google-chrome
Profile Path /home/user/.config/google-chrome/Default
>mfw I don't need a filter list. I can select the lines I'll use and shove it in the procedural cosmetic filters window
>>106400466
>rapes your ad revenue
>attempt to stop it but you only made things worse
>had to remove it from your own fucking browser
>still not enough, streisand effect already established
>thinking of going nuclear and stitching ads to the literal fucking videos themselves
>still wouldn't be enough since sponsorblock would cuck you as well
dOeS wHatEver tHey wAnT
>mfw very static cosmetic filter syntax can also appear inside a procedural cosmetic filter context, because procedural filters are a superset of static css selectors
based @Magnolia1234B
https://gitflic.ru/project/magnolia1234/bypass-paywalls-clean-filters/blob/raw?file=bpc-paywall-filter.txt
>>105564993
nice try google