>>518517946
Like
>>518518061 says, it's all completely unironic pornographic smut
The difference is when I write smut with a human man and a lovely monster woman having a spur-of-the-moment romantic night, it's (kinda rightly I suppose) looked down on. Meanwhile, male monster/human woman smut where he takes her on dates but she still calls herself a feminist is stunning and brave, put up on display in bookstores, and deliberately mislabeled as 'dark romance' so it can be disseminated further to people who shouldn't be fucking reading it in the first place
Irritating stuff