>>534982257
>I'm a zoomer, why was Vietnam considered bad? just not as much content as 1942 or 2
It was a rushed game by a B team studio to capitalize on 1942's success.
If you've ever played Bioshock 2/Arkham Origins/Majoras Mask you know what Vietnam feels like. Not bad, but rushed out using the more popular game's assets with less content and troubling performance. It felt like a standalone expansion to 1942 that should have not coasted full price, and it never got any significant expansion content of its own. There are Vietnam mods in 1942 that were more popular and played better.
The best thing about Vietnam was blasting songs from the choppers. It was kind of kino, but it got repetitive.
BF2 was out barely a year later and made it irrelevant, while others kept playing 1942.