>>96310053
I'm sorry but it seems you don't seem to understand. I already mentioned in the op I can go the "magic" route. I know I can and you are not adding anything to the discussion by saying again and again how I don't need to explain stuff because "fantasy".

I am interested to hear from people, who are into world building, how something like this might work. Because I prefer to have consistent logic in my setting as opposed to not having it.

You almost seem to understand:
>You don't even need to have gravity, you can just say the world is flat and constantly moving upwards,
Exactly. That is one explanation for the behavior we call gravity in another world. You didn't say "don't talk about gravity who cares" but instead you gave a reason why a flat earth behaves similarly to what we know. That is what i'm looking for. Saying "fuck photosynthesis" is like saying "fuck gravity" - you CAN do it, but I assume you understand why one might like to think about it carefully before deciding on it.