>>514208818
>Not really refuting Darwin
I absolutely refuted Darwin.
The lack of a fossil record showing any evidence for evolution utterly refutes Darwin. I don't need to refute Darwin though, since it's never been proved and stands on literally no evidential support.
it was created specifically to negate religious explanations of creation to allow for a secular society.
There's literally no evidence for species changing into other species, and the genetic revolution has utterly proved that such a thing occurring by random errors in genetic code could never form new structures, let along new species.
it's nonsense.

rent free

>>509278866
>Paleotologists and Archaeologists are kike con-men from the luciferian “enlightenment” creating a fake reality for their mindless golem slaves. cope and seethe retard
many such cases
in their chutzpah they call it, 'science'

>>507082656
>what purpose is of this gaslighting?
hide proof of God.