>>149909882
>imply a certain group is respoblile for the destruction of beauty
This one always bugged me. Why do these dipshits think if anything doesnt look like some generic disney slop or weeb slop its literally some nefarious agenda to undermine the normative concept of beauty? These chicken shit retards shouldve never been taught the word subversive because they ran it into the ground, same with moral panic types and the word groomer.