>>24732124
there is an english translation of ibn al-haytham's refutation of ptolemy(i think) floating around on the internet, where he argues through semi-theological means, for something resembling the scientific method or even epistemological anarchism.

ibn taymiyya too, who was a cleric first an foremost, argued in a way similar to (later) wittgenstein against the very foundations of (greek) philosophy - an extension of his understanding of the qur'an and sunnah.

and ibn hazm was ibn hazm.

>There is no mulsim, science, literature or whatever it is just the muslim hammer hadnt reach those icons yet to destroy them.
by saying this, you are attempting to describe a tree without its roots so to say. the nature of your post is polemical rather than descriptive, anyway.