>>514916528
>kill my baby
It's not killing anything if it's not a living human being yet. That's what the Miracle of Birth is all about.

The statistics suggest that half of all pregnancies are naturally terminated pregnancies (miscarriages) that end without birth. So there might be a few case out there where you can condemn women for misbehaving, but the vast majority are natural. On top of that, most birth control pills are abortifacients that cause the blastocyte to fail to attach to the uterine wall.

The fetus is not a human being yet so a moral choice is not being made. Why would a woman feel guilty for exercising her natural rights? It is not morally consistent to say the fetus must be protected at the expense of a woman's natural right to decide for herself if she will be a bear a child or not, but it's OK to throw the born child to the wolves. If human lives matter, the law should reflect that especially for those already alive.

It is not morally consistent to say fetal termination is equivalent to homicide, then carve out an exception for rape. If the justification is that a rape victim has suffered enough, or that she should not be forced to raise a baby she cannot love or does not want, then all abortions are just being graded on a spectrum of the current state of pregnant woman's misery.

It is the Natural Law right of woman to decide for herself if she will become a mother (self-determination). Only totalitarians states force women to abort or bear children, same with brutal religious states. If there's any ambiguity, then lets err on the side of the living, breathing woman and respect her rights to decide for herself if she will reproduce or not. The misogynistic rights-grabbing anti-choicers seem a little too eager to torture and punish women for imaginary sins to take them seriously.