>>514156302
so when i ask about ultimate meaning, you respond by redefining the question to something else entirely, then declare that my original framing was “irrelevant.”

bold move. it’s like being asked about the existence of objective morality and replying, “i like chocolate ice cream.” technically true, but not remotely responsive.

also, calling atheism “just an opinion about gods” is like saying gravity is “just an opinion about falling.”
sure, atheism technically only rejects belief in deities, but when you build a worldview on that foundation, it has implications. one of those is the absence of cosmic telos.
that’s not a strawman, it’s a consequence.

but hey, if subjective meaning is all that matters, then i guess the question “what is the ultimate meaning of life?” is just a typo. silly me for taking words seriously.
don't respond again with fewer than 500 characters of your own or i won't engage with it.