>>939411098
Calling it ‘wishful thinking’ doesn’t really engage with the arguments themselves. Wishful thinking is believing something in spite of the evidence. What’s being presented here is belief because of multiple converging lines of evidence and reasoning.
Philosophy, cosmology, morality, consciousness, history—these aren’t just vague hopes, they’re serious attempts to account for reality. You don’t have to agree with the conclusions, but it’s not honest to reduce centuries of thought and billions of human experiences to ‘just wishful thinking.’
If anything, dismissing it all out of hand looks closer to wishful thinking—wishing the arguments away without wrestling with them.
>>939411174
Go back to gooning, bot
