>>24689838
She still has a whole demeanour of disdain and aggrieved prudence through the video making it clear that the whole topic of smut, fanservice and sex scenes in books for any reason whatsoever make her uncomfortable. I think she was aiming for the slightly-more-intellectual 19th century women compared to the unwashed masses of femcels who write the smut.

> but it should absolutely not be normal or publicly available.
And that's exactly the problem. These prudish type of accusations as the one she was making the video quickly lean themselves for these callings of censorship, book-burning and general anti-artist thug-behaviour. The truth is that good art will always have some transgressive element to it that offends some people. Violence, uncomfortable social critique or just not fitting into a mould. And let's be honest: violence and sex are just fun. Just like rock-and-roll is fun. The idea that women shouldn't leave their fantasy books with romance in them is as stupid as to say men should ban video games and anime. And is hated as a position held by moral busybodies.